论继续盘问的空置化及解决

发布时间：2018-03-07 03:04

本文选题：继续盘问　切入点：空置化　出处：《河南社会科学》2013年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：自《公安机关适用继续盘问规定》实施以来,部分基层公安机关很少甚至不再适用继续盘问措施,而是根据案件性质决定适用行政或者刑事传唤、拘传,继续盘问措施空置化现象已经相当严重。为此,应分析继续盘问空置化的现状和原因,研究空置化的后果。为充分利用好继续盘问措施来履行警察职责,就要解决继续盘问空置化问题,应从四个方面入手:一是要明确继续盘问的法律性质;二是要强调违法犯罪嫌疑人到案措施的合法性,对非法适用到案措施所取证据予以排除;三是要细化继续盘问措施的相关规定;四是要提高《继续盘问规定》适用的可操作性。
[Abstract]:Since the implementation of the "provisions on continuous interrogation by Public Security organs", some grass-roots public security organs have rarely or even ceased to apply the measures of continuing cross-examination, but have decided to apply administrative or criminal summons and arrest according to the nature of the case. The phenomenon of continuous interrogation is already quite serious. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the present situation and reasons of continuing cross-examination, to study the consequences of the vacancy, and to make full use of the continuous interrogation measures to perform the duties of the police. In order to solve the problem, we should start from four aspects: first, we should make clear the legal nature of the continuous cross-examination; second, we should emphasize the legality of the illegal suspect to the case, and exclude the evidence obtained from the illegal application of the measure to the case. The third is to refine the relevant provisions of the measures of continuous cross-examination, and the fourth is to improve the operability of the application of the provisions of continuous cross-examination.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学;
【基金】：2011年度中国法学会部级法学研究课题(CLS2011C33)
【分类号】：D925.2;D922.14

【相似文献】