仲裁机构法律功能批判——以国际商事仲裁为分析视角

发布时间：2018-03-09 06:23

本文选题：仲裁机构　切入点：法律功能　出处：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国仲裁机构法律功能的不断扩张已成为阻碍我国仲裁法制进步的瓶颈。不断强化的仲裁机构法律功能,主要表现为仲裁机构性质决定仲裁裁决国籍、仲裁机构行为决定仲裁裁决效力、仲裁机构侵蚀仲裁权决定管辖权异议、仲裁机构所在地法决定仲裁协议效力等。同时,制度展开与实践运行不断挑战并异化立法,仲裁机构规范呈现碎片化趋势。以机构仲裁为中心的仲裁制度、将仲裁机构类比法院、忽视国际商事仲裁的特殊性是仲裁机构法律功能被强化的主要原因。其后果是影响仲裁功能的发挥、不利于中国仲裁的国际化,也是仲裁诉讼化、行政化的根源。修法应以弱化仲裁机构的法律功能为核心,提升"仲裁庭"和"仲裁地"的法律功能为重点。具体路径包括删除仲裁机构分类、弱化仲裁机构介入仲裁程序的权力、虚化仲裁机构所在地法对仲裁协议和仲裁裁决的影响等方面。
[Abstract]:The continuous expansion of the legal function of our country's arbitration institutions has become the bottleneck that hinders the progress of our country's arbitration legal system. The legal functions of the arbitration institutions are mainly manifested in the nature of the arbitration institutions determining the nationality of the arbitration awards. The behavior of the arbitration institution determines the validity of the arbitration award, the arbitration institution erodes the right of arbitration to determine the jurisdictional objection, the law of the seat of the arbitration institution determines the validity of the arbitration agreement, and so on. At the same time, the system development and practice constantly challenge and dissimilate the legislation. The norms of arbitration institutions show a trend of fragmentation. The arbitration system, which centers on institutional arbitration, compares the arbitration institutions to the courts, Ignoring the particularity of international commercial arbitration is the main reason why the legal function of the arbitration institution is strengthened. Its consequence is that it affects the exertion of the arbitration function, is not conducive to the internationalization of China's arbitration, and is also the litigation of arbitration. The reform of the law should focus on weakening the legal function of the arbitration institution and promoting the legal function of the "arbitral tribunal" and "place of arbitration". The specific path includes the deletion of the classification of the arbitration institution. It weakens the power of the arbitration institution to intervene in the arbitration procedure and the influence of the law of the place of the arbitration institution on the arbitration agreement and the arbitration award.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：2011年度国家社会科学基金项目(11CFX075)“国际商事仲裁中的国家豁免问题研究”
【分类号】：D925.7

【相似文献】