刑事和解尚须厘清的八个问题

发布时间：2018-03-10 16:39

本文选题：刑事和解　切入点：罪刑法定　出处：《人民检察》2013年13期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国的刑事和解不是也不能是刑事案件的整体和解,而只能是刑事案件的当事人和解。刑事案件当事人和解的本质是刑事案件被害人与加害人之间利益冲突和法律责任的和解。相对原刑法规定的刑期,刑事案件和解之后,被告人应当受到从轻、减轻或者免除处罚。被害人有权超出一定的范围要求加害人赔偿,也有权放弃一定范围的赔偿。刑事案件和解的范围应当适用于所有有被害人的案件。修改后刑诉法没有规定公安机关对达成和解的刑事案件拥有撤案的权力,否则,即为违反了刑事诉讼法的规定。刑事和解后对被告人进行从宽处罚,与是否"花钱买刑"无关,而且符合罪刑法定原则和刑罚的立法精神。
[Abstract]:Criminal reconciliation in China is not and cannot be the overall reconciliation of criminal cases. The essence of the reconciliation of the parties in a criminal case is the conflict of interest and the reconciliation of legal responsibility between the victim and the perpetrator of the criminal case. After the settlement of the criminal case, compared with the term of imprisonment stipulated in the original criminal law, The accused shall be given a lighter, mitigated or exempted punishment. The victim shall have the right to demand compensation from the perpetrator beyond a certain scope, The scope of settlement in criminal cases should be applicable to all cases where there are victims. The revised Criminal procedure Law does not provide that public security organs have the power to withdraw cases in criminal cases that have reached a settlement, otherwise, That is to say, in violation of the provisions of the Criminal procedure Law, the lenient punishment of the defendant after the criminal reconciliation has nothing to do with whether or not to "spend money to buy the penalty", and conforms to the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime and the legislative spirit of the penalty.
【作者单位】：复旦大学;中国刑事诉讼法学会;浙江省台州市人民检察院;浙江省德清县人民检察院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】