以审判为中心刑事速裁机制的配比评估

发布时间：2018-03-10 16:23

本文选题：审判中心主义　切入点：侦查中心主义　出处：《河南社会科学》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：审判中心的提出是对过去中国刑事司法程序中公检法三机关"分工负责、相互配合、相互制约"的流线型运作模式的深刻反思,也是从顶层高度审视未来一段时期内的改革方向和基本框架。中国在转型时期提出审判中心主义,并非是学习英美法系或者学习大陆法系的选择问题,而是不同法系面对如何实现公平正义、如何正确定罪量刑、如何保障基本人权三大议题的共同探索。审判中心主义的提出开启了中国司法体制改革的新阶段,而重新在各个主体、各个阶段之间配置司法权,成为改革的重中之重,而如何贯彻落实这一改革措施,也成为学界与司法实务界探讨的热点。为了更好地学习贯彻十八届四中、五中全会精神,本刊编辑部特邀相关专家进行专题研究,得到了一些对此问题素有研究的学者的积极回应,供读者参考。
[Abstract]:The proposal of the trial center is a profound reflection on the streamlined operation mode of the public security bureau, the procuratorate and the court in the past in China's criminal judicial process, which is "responsible for, cooperating with, and restricting each other". It is also a top-level examination of the direction and basic framework of reform in the future period. In the period of transition, China put forward adjudication-centrism, which is not the choice of learning Anglo-American law system or learning continental law system. Instead, different legal systems are faced with the common exploration of how to realize fairness and justice, how to correctly convict and sentence, how to guarantee the basic human rights. The proposal of judicial centralism has opened a new stage in the reform of China's judicial system. The re-allocation of judicial power among various subjects and stages has become the most important part of the reform, and how to carry out this reform measure has also become a hot topic to be discussed by the academic and judicial practitioners. In order to better study and implement the fourth session of the 18 National Congress of the people's Republic of China, In the spirit of the Fifth Plenary session of the Fifth Plenary session, the editorial Department of our journal specially invited relevant experts to carry out special research, which has received positive responses from some scholars who have been studying this issue for readers' reference.
【作者单位】：天津市河北区人民检察院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】