不起诉程序中被害人的权利救济机制研究
发布时间:2018-03-12 08:35
本文选题:不起诉程序 切入点:被害人权利救济机制 出处:《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:检察机关作出的不起诉决定,对于受到犯罪行为直接侵害的被害人影响较大,赋予被害人在不起程序中的救济权利,能够有效发挥不起诉程序的应有价值。本文首先从不起诉程序中被害人权利救济机制的价值基础进行分析,同时,从保障不起诉程序的有效运作和维护社会秩序的稳定这两个目标层面对该机制予以分析。其次,对各国不起诉程序中被害人的权利救济机制进行比较,详细阐述被害人权利救济机制的区别和联系,并从法治文化、立法目的和检察官的追诉职能等三个方面进行深入地分析。在立足于各国法律规定的基础上,探索不起诉程序中被害人权利救济机制的应然模式,并以博弈论的视角对该应然模式进行价值分析。再次,对我国不起诉程序中被害人的权利救济机制进行深度剖析,查找出存在的问题。最后,从保障被害人的参与权、对被害人权利救济区分类型、对不起诉决定的救济进行申诉前置、完善被害人的法律援助制度和通过规范“公诉转自诉”案件中检察机关的协助义务、建立被害人行使救济权的制约机制以实现对“公诉转自诉”诉讼程序的改进等五个角度,为进一步完善我国不起诉程序中被害人的权利救济机制提供具体、可行的改进路径。
[Abstract]:The decision made by the procuratorial organ not to prosecute has a greater impact on the victims who have been directly infringed by the criminal act, and gives the victims the right to remedy in the process that they cannot afford. This paper first analyzes the value foundation of the victim's right relief mechanism in the non-prosecution procedure, at the same time, This paper analyzes the mechanism from the two aspects of ensuring the effective operation of the non-prosecution procedure and maintaining the stability of social order. Secondly, it compares the relief mechanisms of the rights of the victims in the non-prosecution procedure in various countries. The difference and relation of the relief mechanism of victim's rights are elaborated in detail, and analyzed deeply from three aspects: the culture of rule of law, the purpose of legislation and the prosecution function of the prosecutor. This paper probes into the ought mode of victim's right relief mechanism in non-prosecution procedure, and analyzes the value of this model from the perspective of game theory. Thirdly, the author deeply analyzes the relief mechanism of victim's right in non-prosecution procedure in our country. Find out the existing problems. Finally, from the protection of the victim's right to participate, the victims' rights relief differentiated types, the non-prosecution of the decision to appeal the relief, Perfecting the legal aid system of the victim, standardizing the duty of assistance of the procuratorial organ in the case of "public prosecution to private prosecution" and establishing the restriction mechanism of the victim's right of relief in order to realize the improvement of the procedure of "public prosecution to private prosecution". It provides a concrete and feasible way to improve the relief mechanism of victims' rights in the procedure of non-prosecution in our country.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘静坤;;刑事审判程序繁简分流与公正审判[J];法律适用;2016年06期
2 武晓慧;;论公诉裁量权的运行与程序性控制[J];中国刑事法杂志;2016年01期
3 杜磊;;论检察指令权的实体规制[J];中国法学;2016年01期
4 孟穗;;刑事和解中被害人地位的重新定位[J];河北法学;2016年01期
5 李辞;;论附条件不起诉与酌定不起诉的关系[J];法学论坛;2014年04期
6 郑丽萍;;轻罪起诉裁量制度的反思与改革[J];法治研究;2012年07期
7 张\,
本文编号:1600794
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1600794.html