清代地方社会的诉讼实态

发布时间：2018-03-13 08:44

本文选题：清代　切入点：地方社会　出处：《清史研究》2013年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：对清代地方社会的诉讼实态,由于史料的来源和分析的视角不同,现有的研究得出了"反诉讼社会"、"诉讼社会"两种截然不同的结论。"反诉讼社会"论者站在官方的立场,运用官箴、典籍一类的文献,更多的是表达了官民对无讼社会的理想诉求;而"诉讼社会"论者则是爬梳档案、方志、县官记录一类更接近民众实际生活的数据,力求探知到当时地方诉讼的实际状态。"反诉讼社会"论作为上层的政治理想无可厚非,事实上,官方为实现这一理想,也有一系列的制度设计;而检讨"诉讼社会"论,疑问不少。"健讼"、"无讼"实则是一个话语的表达,官方及书写者关于"健讼"的描述与"无讼"一样,是一个基于道德和现实层面的价值判断,它并非指可以测算的诉讼规模。
[Abstract]:Due to the different sources of historical materials and different angles of view of analysis, the existing studies have drawn two different conclusions: "anti-litigation society" and "litigation society". The "anti-litigation society" theorists stand in the official position. The use of documents such as official proverbs and classic books more expresses the ideal demands of the government and the people for a non-litigant society, while the "litigation society" theorists are crawling through archives, local records, and county officials recording data that are closer to the actual life of the people. Try to find out the actual state of the local litigation at that time. "Anti-Litigation Society" as the political ideal of the upper class is not to blame. In fact, the government also has a series of system designs to realize this ideal; and it reviews the "litigation society" theory. There are many questions. "Litigation" and "No-Litigation" are in fact an expression of words. The description of "Litigation" by the official and the writer is a value judgment based on moral and realistic aspects, and it does not refer to the measurable scale of litigation.
【作者单位】：西华师范大学历史文化学院;中国人民大学法律与历史研究所;
【基金】：国家社科重大项目《清代南部县衙档案整理与研究》(11&ZD093) 中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(20110482)成果
【分类号】：D929;D925;K249

【参考文献】