论虚假诉讼法律规制

发布时间：2018-03-13 22:44

本文选题：虚假诉讼　切入点：法律规制　出处：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：当前,在司法实践中当事人通过恶意串通来掩盖不法目的的虚假诉讼现象频频多发,屡禁不止并呈多发态势。虚假诉讼行为直接损害案外人的合法权益、直接侵犯公正良好的司法审判秩序,与我国诚实信用原则背道而驰、对社会诚信体系的建设造成妨碍,严重浪费了有限的司法资源,更违背了司法公正、损害了司法权威性与公信力,已成为司法领域的顽疾。新民事诉讼法及民诉法解释虽然对虚假诉讼提供了一定的程序法规制,但由于目前社会社会诚信不完善、当事人及案外人的法律意识不强、具有可操作性及制裁性的法律法规的缺失、民事诉讼制度缺陷及司法实践中具体的现实因素等原因,无法全面遏制虚假诉讼呈多类型化的蔓延。因此,虚假诉讼如何规制成为司法实践中迫切需要解决的问题。本文写作将从三个方面进行表述。首先将对虚假诉讼的概述及危害进行介绍。虚假诉讼的概述包括虚假诉讼的概念及特点;虚假诉讼的危害主要表现在以下几个方面:侵害他人的合法权益,浪费有限的司法资源,损害司法的权威性、公信力、扰乱正常的司法审判秩序,违反诚实信用的原则、阻碍社会诚信体系建设。第二部分内容阐述虚假诉讼法律规制的现状及存在问题。虚假诉讼的规制现状主要从立法规制的现状和司法规制的现状两方面进行分析;虚假诉讼法律规制存在的问题主要表现在立法规制存在的问题和司法规制存在的问题两方面。第三部分内容讲述虚假诉讼法律规制完善的建议。关于虚假诉讼法律规制的建议,本文主要从立法规制和司法规制两方面进行完善。立法规制措施主要包括完善调解、证据审查、当事人自认、第三人参与诉讼、简易程序等民事诉讼制度和完善民事损害赔偿制度等;司法规制措施主要包括加强立案、审理、执行环节的审查;完善内部考评管理机制;建立诉讼通报制度,确立案件信息联网机制;加强综合防治机制;提升法官素质等。
[Abstract]:At present, in the judicial practice, the false litigation phenomenon of the parties through malicious collusion to cover up the illegal purpose is frequently frequent, repeated prohibition and multiple situation. The false litigation act directly damages the legitimate rights and interests of the outsider in the case. The direct violation of the just and good judicial order runs counter to the principle of good faith in our country, hinders the construction of the social credit system, seriously wastes limited judicial resources, and even violates the judicial justice. It has damaged the judicial authority and credibility, and has become a persistent problem in the judicial field. Although the new civil procedure law and the interpretation of the civil procedure law provide certain procedural law regulation for the false litigation, but the social integrity is not perfect at present. The legal consciousness of the parties and the outsiders in the case is not strong, the lack of the laws and regulations which have maneuverability and sanction, the defects of the civil litigation system and the concrete practical factors in the judicial practice, and so on. Unable to fully curb the spread of multiple types of false litigation. How to regulate false litigation has become an urgent problem in judicial practice. This paper will describe it from three aspects. Firstly, it will introduce the outline and harm of false litigation. The summary of false litigation includes false litigation. The concept and characteristics of litigation; The harm of false litigation lies in the following aspects: infringing upon the legitimate rights and interests of others, wasting limited judicial resources, damaging the authority and credibility of the judiciary, disrupting the normal judicial order and violating the principle of good faith. The second part expounds the current situation and existing problems of the legal regulation of false litigation. The present situation of the regulation of false litigation is mainly analyzed from two aspects: the current situation of legislative regulation and the current situation of judicial regulation; The problems existing in the legal regulation of false litigation are mainly manifested in two aspects: the problems existing in the legislative regulation and the problems in the judicial regulation. The third part describes the suggestions on the perfection of the legal regulation of the false litigation, and the suggestions on the legal regulation of the false litigation. This article mainly from the legislative regulation and the judicial regulation two aspects carries on the consummation, the legislative regulation measure mainly includes consummates the mediation, the evidence examination, the party admits, the third party participates in the lawsuit, Summary procedure and other civil litigation systems and the improvement of civil damage compensation system; the judicial regulation measures mainly include strengthening the examination of filing, trial and execution, perfecting the internal evaluation management mechanism, establishing the lawsuit notification system, Establish the case information networking mechanism; strengthen the comprehensive prevention mechanism; improve the quality of judges.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】