损害私人利益虚假纠纷诉讼调解书的检察监督——从民事检察监督定位的分类谈起

发布时间：2018-03-15 05:11

本文选题：虚假纠纷诉讼　切入点：调解书　出处：《广西社会科学》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：检察机关在民事检察监督中的角色定位应当分为作为诉讼主体的“亲历监督者”与超然于诉讼利益的“纯粹监督者”,只有当国家利益与公共利益受到损害且无有力诉讼救济主张者时,检察机关才可亲历监督。当虚假纠纷诉讼调解书损害私人利益时,由于虚假纠纷诉讼行为属于诉讼违法行为中最严重的一类,因此检察机关至少须进行纯粹监督;而在上述调解书涉及系列案时,则必须亲历监督。由此,调解书损害私人利益的情形不能当然纳入二百零八条规定情形的,全由检察机关亲历监督。
[Abstract]:The role of procuratorial organs in civil procuratorial supervision should be divided into "experienced supervisors" as the subject of litigation and "pure supervisors" who are aloof from the interests of litigation, only when the national and public interests are damaged and there is no such thing. When the litigant relief claims, When the false dispute mediation statement damages the private interests, the false dispute litigation is the most serious one, so the procuratorial organ must at least carry out pure supervision. And when the above-mentioned mediation document involves a series of cases, it must be supervised personally. As a result, if the mediation statement impairs the private interests of the court, it cannot of course be included in the provisions of 208 articles, all of which shall be supervised by the procuratorial organ in person.
【作者单位】：中山大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】