我国司法建议制度探析

发布时间：2018-03-16 01:33

本文选题：司法建议　切入点：裁判延伸　出处：《南京师范大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：司法建议被人们看作是实践能动司法的典范,越来越受到我国司法学术界和实务界的重视。人民法院独创的司法建议制度正是法院在行使司法审判权的自我延伸和社会管理的创新,法院不再是被动的行使审判权,法院主动发挥司法权的社会职能,积极主动的加入社会的管理,司法建议也成了人民法院在参与社会管理的过程中的重要方式。本文主要分为四个部分,第一部分是对司法建议相关概念的概述,第一部分首先从时间纵向上对司法建议的产生与发展做出三个时间段的划分,然后对司法建议的概念与性质进行学理分析,并尝试通过结合不同学者的已有研究成果从学理上对我国的司法建议有一个清醒的认识,其次按照一定的标准对司法建议的类型做出预警防范型、个案纠正型、沟通调解型、执行辅助型四类划分。本部分在论及司法建议的效力时主张对司法建议按照不同类型赋予不同的法律效力。本文第二部分将着重从司法建议制度的价值和功能两方面展开对司法建议的正当性进行论证,其中司法价值主要是论及司法建议的制度价值,主要从司法建议的秩序价值和治理价值两个方面展开。本部分对司法建议的功能进行论述时主要结合司法建议的发生作用的对象将司法建议的功能划分为司法建议的司法功能以及司法建议的社会功能,司法建议的司法功能主要从司法能动功能、温和调解功能、执行辅助功能展开,司法建议的社会功能主要是从指导监督功能以及教育启蒙两方面展开,本文第三部分着重客观阐述司法建议制度的现状和目前司法建议制度存在的问题原因,本部分的现状主要是从司法建议的立法现状和实践现状两个方面展开,其中司法建议的实践现状主要是从司法建议实践中的司法建议的适用范围、司法建议的质量、司法建议的制作程序、司法建议的管理规范以及司法建议的监督落实机制展开,而本部分论及司法建议问题原因时主要是从主观上社会主体认识不足、立法不完善、制作程序单一化三个方面展开论述。本文第四部分主要是针对第三部分司法建议存在的现状提出具有针对性的完善措施并尝试从整体统一上对司法建议制度的发展改革,提出自己的一些见解。本部分主要从四个方面展开,第一个完善措施是从立法上进行统一,第二个方面便是要让社会主体认识到司法建议的重要性,第三个方面主要是对司法建议规范化建设,第四个方面便是建立有关司法建议的辅助机制。虽然当下司法建议制度还是存在很多问题和不足,但是笔者认为这些问题都会在逐渐的完善过程中被一一解决。
[Abstract]:Judicial advice is regarded as a model of active judicial practice. More and more attention has been paid to the judicial academic and practical circles in our country. The judicial suggestion system created by the people's court is precisely the self-extension of the court's exercise of judicial jurisdiction and the innovation of social management, and the court is no longer passively exercising its judicial power. The court actively exerts the social function of the judicial power, actively joins the social management, the judicial suggestion has also become the important way of the people's court in the process of participating in the social management. The first part is an overview of the relevant concepts of judicial advice. The first part of the first part of the time vertical division of the emergence and development of judicial advice, and then the concept and nature of judicial advice theoretical analysis. And try to combine the existing research results of different scholars to have a clear understanding of the judicial advice of our country from the theoretical point of view, secondly, according to certain standards, to make the types of judicial advice as early warning and prevention type, case correction type, communication and mediation type, This part, when dealing with the validity of judicial advice, claims to give different legal effects to judicial advice according to different types. The second part of this paper will focus on the value and function of judicial advice system. On the other hand, to demonstrate the legitimacy of the judicial proposal, The judicial value mainly refers to the institutional value of judicial recommendations. The function of judicial advice is divided into judicial construction by combining the function of judicial advice with the object of its occurrence. The judicial function and the social function of judicial advice, The judicial function of judicial suggestion is mainly from judicial active function, moderate mediation function, executive auxiliary function. The social function of judicial suggestion is mainly from two aspects: guidance and supervision function and education enlightenment. The third part of this paper focuses on the status quo of the judicial suggestion system and the reasons for the problems existing in the current judicial suggestion system. The present situation of this part is mainly from the legislative and practical aspects of the judicial advice. The present situation of judicial recommendation is mainly from the scope of application, the quality of judicial suggestion, the procedure of making judicial recommendation, the management norm of judicial recommendation and the mechanism of supervision and implementation of judicial recommendation. When this part discusses the reasons of judicial suggestion, it is mainly due to the lack of subjective understanding of the social subject and the imperfect legislation. The 4th part of this paper is mainly aimed at the present situation of the third part of judicial advice and tries to reform the development of judicial suggestion system from the overall unification. This part mainly starts from four aspects, the first perfect measure is to unify from the legislation, the second aspect is to let the social subject realize the importance of the judicial suggestion. The third aspect is mainly the standardization of judicial proposals, and the fourth aspect is the establishment of auxiliary mechanisms for judicial advice. Although the current judicial advice system still has many problems and shortcomings, But I think these problems will be solved one by one in the process of gradual improvement.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】