刑事书面言词证据的效力规范——以台湾地区传闻证据规则为参考

发布时间：2018-03-15 22:26

本文选题：书面言词证据　切入点：传闻证据　出处：《人民检察》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：2003年,因应刑事诉讼当事人主义化的改革,台湾地区修正并增补了其"刑事诉讼法"第一百五十九条,明确引入传闻规则。该规则的引入在台湾法学界引起了广泛的论争,实务部门对此也态度不一,反映了立法和实践的背离。通过对刑事传闻证据规则引入台湾地区后理论和实务界的一系列反馈进行分析,建议大陆在刑事书面言词证据的效力规范上,应吸取台湾地区的教训,做到规范体系化、标准明晰化、制度配套化。
[Abstract]:In 2003, in response to the reform of the doctrine of litigants in criminal proceedings, Taiwan amended and added 159th articles of its Criminal procedure Law, introducing hearsay rules explicitly. The introduction of this rule has caused extensive controversy in Taiwan's legal circles. The practice departments also have different attitudes on this, reflecting the deviation between legislation and practice. Through the analysis of a series of feedback from the theoretical and practical circles after the introduction of the criminal hearsay evidence rules into the Taiwan region, It is suggested that the mainland should draw lessons from the lessons of Taiwan in the standardization of the effectiveness of the evidence of criminal written words, and make the standardization systematized, the standard clear, and the system complete.
【作者单位】：福建省莆田市人民检察院;福建省莆田市城厢区人民检察院;莆田市涵江区人民检察院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】