论中国专家辅助人制度完善——以借鉴大陆法系国家相关制度为视角

发布时间：2018-03-17 11:45

本文选题：专家辅助人　切入点：鉴定人　出处：《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：2012年《刑事诉讼法》增设了专家辅助人,作为诉讼角色能够帮助法庭就鉴定意见进行有效质证,在保证庭审实质性的同时促进"审判中心主义"的实现。在司法实践中,专家辅助人制度没能发挥其应有的价值,具体运行规则的缺失是导致这一情况的最主要原因之一——关于专家辅助人的诉讼地位、诉讼权利和专家意见的证据属性等问题法律都没有明确的规定。在俄罗斯、意大利等大陆法系国家,专家辅助人相关制度已经有效运行了几十年。在中国未来的司法改革中应当借鉴其他国家的成熟经验,完善"专家辅助人"制度的相关规定——确定专家辅助人的辩护人诉讼地位,明确其相应的诉讼权利,例如鉴定情况通知权、鉴定内容建议权和阅卷权等,这样专家辅助人制度能够更加有效运行。
[Abstract]:In 2012, an expert assistant was added to the Criminal procedure Law, which, as a lawsuit role, can help the court to conduct effective cross-examination of the appraisal opinion, and to promote the realization of "trial centrism" while ensuring the substantive nature of the trial. The system of expert auxiliaries failed to play its due value. The lack of specific operational rules is one of the most important reasons for this situation-about the litigation status of the expert assistant. There are no clear provisions in the law on litigation rights and the evidentiary attributes of expert opinions. In countries with civil law systems such as Russia and Italy, The relevant system of expert assistant has been running effectively for several decades. In China's future judicial reform, we should learn from the mature experience of other countries. Perfecting the relevant provisions of the system of "expert auxiliaries"-ascertaining the litigant status of the defender of the expert assistant and clarifying its corresponding litigation rights, such as the right to notify the appraisal situation, the right to advise on the content of the appraisal and the right to read papers, etc. In this way, the expert assistant system can operate more effectively.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】