刑事庭审实质化视野中的公诉证据标准

发布时间：2018-03-18 08:40

本文选题：刑事庭审实质化　切入点：公诉证据标准　出处：《江海学刊》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：中国学界对公诉证据标准先后进行了两次热烈的讨论,但至今仍然没有澄清其基本的法理逻辑。公诉证据标准的法律设定和实践把握与审判证明标准的类型有根本的逻辑关联,从比较法来看,后者呈现出多种类型,因而,也致使前者呈现出不同的类型。倚重于庭审来解决争议的案件类型对审判证明标准有特定的要求,因此,欲实现我国的刑事庭审实质化改革,应当改变对审判证明标准的习惯理解,进而改变对公诉证据标准的法律表述与理解,设定相对低于审判证明标准的公诉证据标准,并在拓展证据范围的同时对起诉的证据类型作出必要的限定。
[Abstract]:There have been two heated discussions on the standard of evidence for public prosecution in Chinese academic circles, but so far it has not been clarified its basic legal logic. The legal setting and practice of the standard of evidence for public prosecution has a fundamental logic relation with the type of standard of proof in trial. From the point of view of comparative law, the latter presents many types, and thus causes the former to present different types. The types of cases that rely on trial to resolve disputes have specific requirements on the standard of proof of trial, so, In order to realize the substantive reform of criminal trial in our country, we should change the customary understanding of the standard of proof of trial, then change the legal expression and understanding of the standard of evidence of public prosecution, and set up the standard of evidence of public prosecution which is relatively lower than the standard of proof of trial. And expand the scope of evidence at the same time to prosecute the type of evidence necessary to limit.
【作者单位】：西南民族大学法学院;青海省海南州人民检察院;
【基金】：教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-13-0982) 四川省创新团队“西部民族法治发展与创新研究”(项目号:15TD0049) 西南民族大学研究生学位点建设项目(项目号:2017XWDS0301)资助
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】