违反讯问录音录像规定所获供述之证据能力问题

发布时间：2018-03-18 10:12

本文选题：录音录像　切入点：供述　出处：《证据科学》2015年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：2012年《刑事诉讼法》确立了讯问时的全程录音录像制度,但由于立法规定过于原则化,加之缺乏制裁性机制,导致在司法实践中大量存在选择性录制、先审后录、讯问后补录或重录等违反该制度规定的现象,在借鉴其他国家和地区的相关规定的基础上,适用刚性模式,强制性地排除选择性录制和先审后录所获得的供述,对于讯问后补录或重录所获得的供述,则根据不同的情形采用推定模式予以排除。同时还应看到排除违法录音录像所获供述还将面临着口供中心主义依然盛行、立法上缺乏相应的证据规则、以审判为中心的诉讼制度尚未建立等一系列现实因素的制约。
[Abstract]:In 2012, the Criminal procedure Law established the whole audio and video recording system during interrogation. However, due to the excessive principle of legislative provisions and the lack of sanctions mechanism, there are a large number of selective recordings in judicial practice. On the basis of drawing lessons from the relevant provisions of other countries and regions and applying the rigid model, the statements obtained from selective recording and pre-trial recording are forcibly excluded from the phenomenon of violation of the provisions of the system, such as rerecording or rerecording after interrogation, and on the basis of reference to the relevant provisions of other countries and regions, For statements obtained from supplementary or rerecorded statements after interrogation, the presumption model shall be used to exclude them according to different circumstances. At the same time, it should be noted that the exclusion of confessions obtained by illegal audio and video recordings will also face the continued prevalence of confession centrism. The legislation lacks the corresponding evidence rules, and the trial-centered litigation system has not yet been established, which is restricted by a series of realistic factors.
【作者单位】：四川警察学院;
【基金】：四川警察执法研究中心重点项目“犯罪嫌疑人供述自愿性的权利保障与权力限制”(编号:JCZFZD0403)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】