论我国法院副卷制度的改革

发布时间：2018-03-20 06:05

本文选题：副卷　切入点：正卷　出处：《法学评论》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国法院的案卷有正卷、副卷之分。法院副卷严格保密、严禁查阅是各级人民法院长期执行的一项工作原则。随着我国法治建设的发展,法院副卷制度存在的问题也日益凸显出来:它不符合司法公开和审判公开的发展趋势;违反独立行使审判权的司法规律和严禁干预司法活动的规定;限制并缩小了当事人、诉讼代理人以及辩护人的阅卷权;背离了现代诉讼证据裁判原则的基本要求。改革法院副卷制度具有重要意义,有助于深化司法公开,增强当事人和社会公众的知情权,并使其感受到程序正义。改革的设想是通过逐渐限缩副卷中的材料范围,依对外公开阻力的不同将副卷中的材料分阶段、分步骤地转入正卷,最终实现所有诉讼材料一卷保存、彻底废除副卷的目标。
[Abstract]:The court file of our country has the positive volume, the secondary volume is divided into two parts. The court deputy volume is strictly confidential and strictly forbidden to consult. It is a working principle that people's courts at all levels carry out for a long time. With the development of the construction of the rule of law in our country, The problems existing in the system of the subsidiary volume of the court have also become increasingly prominent: it does not conform to the development trend of judicial openness and open trial; violates the judicial law of independent exercise of judicial power and strictly prohibits interference in judicial activities; restricts and narrows the parties concerned. It deviates from the basic requirements of the principle of judgment of evidence in modern litigation. It is of great significance to reform the system of subsidiary volume of the court, which is helpful to deepen the judicial openness and strengthen the right of the parties and the public to know. The idea of the reform is to gradually reduce the scope of the material in the subsidiary volume, according to the different external publicity resistance, the material in the secondary volume can be transferred into the positive volume step by step, so as to realize the preservation of all the litigation materials in one volume. Completely abolish the objective of the secondary volume.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学研究所;
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】