司法行政事务管理权配置:历史沿革、现实困境与发展趋势
发布时间:2018-03-20 09:47
本文选题:司法行政事务管理权 切入点:司法审判权 出处:《甘肃行政学院学报》2017年01期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:探索实行法院司法行政事务管理权与审判权相分离是党的十八届三中、四中全会司法体制改革已经明确的改革方向。从建国后司法行政事务管理权配置的历史沿革来看,它与审判权之间的关系经历了"从分到统"再"由统届分"的发展历程,并导致出现了司法行政化、司法地方化等现实困境。回顾总结这个沿革历程,我们可以发现,我国司法行政事务管理权配置发展是人治与法治不断交锋、司法权与行政权界分不断清晰、司法行政事务治理能力不断提升与治理结构持续优化的结果。笔者认为,未来司法行政事务管理权与司法审判权相分离必将在适宜价值定位的遵循下得以实现。
[Abstract]:To explore the separation of judicial administration right and judicial power is the reform direction of the third Central Committee of the 18 CPC Central Committee and the fourth Plenary session of the CPC Central Committee. From the historical evolution of the disposition of the judicial administrative affairs management power after the founding of the people's Republic of China, the judicial system reform of the fourth Plenary session of the CPC Central Committee has been made clear. The relationship between judicial power and judicial power has gone through the development of "from division to unification" and "divided by unified session", and has led to the emergence of judicial administration, judicial localization and other practical difficulties. Looking back and summarizing this evolution, we can find that, The disposition and development of the management power of judicial administration affairs in our country is the result of the continuous confrontation between the rule of man and the rule of law, the clear division between the judicial power and the administrative power, the continuous improvement of the ability of the administration of judicial administration affairs and the continuous optimization of the governance structure. In the future, the separation of the right of administration of judicial affairs from the power of judicial adjudication will be realized under the guidance of the orientation of appropriate value.
【作者单位】: 国家行政学院社会和文化教研部;
【分类号】:D926.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 梁三利;郭明;;法院管理模式比较——基于对英国、德国、法国的考察[J];长江师范学院学报;2010年01期
2 梁三利;;法国混合型法院管理模式探析及其启示[J];太原理工大学学报(社会科学版);2008年04期
3 喻继东;检察同司法行政事务相分离的实践构想[J];检察实践;2003年06期
4 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 许云霞;关于“独立审判”原则的两点思考[N];江苏法制报;2000年
2 秋风;法院不该是个“单位”[N];南方周末;2005年
3 贺卫方(北京大学法学院教授);当法院变成了债务人[N];南方周末;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 廖辉;我国法院司法行政事务管理权与审判权分离机制研究[D];南昌大学;2016年
,本文编号:1638544
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1638544.html