当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

试论我国公诉案件中刑事和解的适用范围

发布时间:2018-03-21 05:55

  本文选题:刑事和解 切入点:适用范围 出处:《广东财经大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:刑事和解作为一种新型刑事案件解决机制,以恢复正义和保障被害人权益为宗旨,在中国本土化构建过程中,与我国传统的宽严相济、和谐社会的司法理念相契合。最大限度的避免双方的对抗与仇视,化解彼此间的矛盾,充分保障被害人权益和促进犯罪人积极的回归社会。而随着我国刑事法律制度的日渐完善,刑事和解制度获得了理论界与实务界普遍的认可。而在刑事诉讼过程中,公民个人权利与国家专断刑罚权、公诉权之间的矛盾日益变大。如何界定公诉案件刑事和解适用范围,已经成了当前刑事和解制度发展的关键。我国2012年新刑事诉讼法,对公诉案件刑事和解程序设立了专门章节,将刑事和解适用范围做了比较明确的界定,但是在司法实践中,仍然存在适用范围较窄,使用标准不明确,各地适用范围不统一等问题。为了促进刑事和解制度的进一步发展。我们应当通过学习和比较国内外刑事和解制度的异同,吸收和借鉴司法实践中存在的诸多问题与经验,对公诉案件刑事和解适用范围作出明确的界定,,对未成年人犯罪案件予以区别立法。根据犯罪人的道德可责性,对公诉案件和解适用范围应适当扩大。
[Abstract]:As a new type of criminal case settlement mechanism, criminal reconciliation aims at restoring justice and protecting the rights and interests of victims. In the process of localization construction in China, criminal reconciliation is combined with the traditional leniency and severity of punishment in China. The judicial concept of a harmonious society is in accord with each other. To the maximum extent, it avoids confrontation and hatred between the two sides, and resolves the contradictions between them. Fully protect the rights of victims and promote the criminals to return to society actively. With the improvement of our criminal legal system, the criminal reconciliation system has been generally recognized by the theoretical and practical circles, and in the process of criminal proceedings, The contradiction between citizen's individual right and the state's arbitrary penalty right and the right of public prosecution is becoming more and more serious. How to define the applicable scope of criminal reconciliation in public prosecution cases has become the key to the development of the current criminal reconciliation system. In 2012, the new criminal procedure law of our country has become the key to the development of the criminal reconciliation system. A special chapter has been set up on the procedure of criminal reconciliation in public prosecution cases, and the scope of criminal reconciliation has been clearly defined. However, in judicial practice, there is still a narrow scope of application, and the standard of application is not clear. In order to promote the further development of the criminal reconciliation system, we should learn and compare the similarities and differences of the criminal reconciliation system at home and abroad and absorb and learn from the many problems and experiences existing in the judicial practice. This paper makes a clear definition of the applicable scope of criminal reconciliation in public prosecution cases, and distinguishes the cases of juvenile delinquency. According to the moral responsibility of the offenders, the applicable scope of reconciliation in public prosecution cases should be expanded appropriately.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 邵军;恢复性司法的利弊之争[J];法学;2005年05期

2 孙万怀;黄敏;;现代刑事司法和解精神的基础[J];法学;2006年04期

3 杨兴培;;刑事和解制度在中国的构建[J];法学;2006年08期

4 刘璐;刑事附带民事诉讼物质损失赔偿范围研究[J];人民检察;2003年06期

5 姚建涛;;刑事和解制度的价值分析[J];学术界;2007年03期

6 陈檬;;正当化事由体系地位初探——以对犯罪构成的体系性思考为切入[J];刑事法评论;2007年02期



本文编号:1642545

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1642545.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7dc77***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com