不起诉自由裁量权的实证性研究

发布时间：2018-03-21 05:16

本文选题：不起诉制度　切入点：不起诉自由裁量权　出处：《山东师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：不起诉制度是刑事诉讼制度的一个重要的组成部分,其指的是对于不符合司法诉讼条件的某些案件,由检察机关对诉讼作出终止决定,而不需通过法院审判处理。这种制度的建立体现了国家对行使权力的审慎态度,对公民行使其合法权益起到有力的保护作用,从而保证无犯罪行为人免除刑事责任,使保障人权这一宗旨在刑事诉讼法中充分体现出来;省去大量的不必要的环节,降低司法成本,减少办案所需的物力和人力,合理避除了司法资源的占用,是诉讼经济原则的充分体现。在实践中,制约和限制不起诉的自由裁量权,将其控制在合理的范围内行使就显得尤为重要。在我国,一方面要保证检察官在审理案件的过程中,能够根据案情的区别和社会危害程度享有一定程度的自由裁量权,另一方面要控制和限制自由裁量权的大小,防止滥用法律所赋予其的权力。因此,本文中笔者将从我国目前对不起诉制度以及不起诉裁量权的制约机制之界定入手,经过对一些相对不起诉案件及存疑不起诉案件的分析,透过问题探究不起诉自由裁量权在司法实践中不规范适用的深层原因,即立法不够完善科学,操作标准不够明确统一,监督机制流于形式,主观认识不够深刻。在此基础上,提出我国刑事诉讼活动中不起诉自由裁量权制度完善和发展的建议与对策:完善不起诉制度的立法、强化对行使不起诉裁量权的严格制约、规范不起诉案件公开审查制度、推进人民监督员制度同不起诉的相关制约机制的衔接。
[Abstract]:The system of non-prosecution is an important part of the criminal procedure system. It refers to the decision of the procuratorial organ to terminate the proceedings in certain cases which do not meet the conditions of judicial proceedings. The establishment of this system reflects the prudent attitude of the state in the exercise of power, and plays a powerful role in protecting citizens from exercising their legitimate rights and interests, thus ensuring that no perpetrator is exempt from criminal responsibility. To ensure that the purpose of safeguarding human rights is fully reflected in the Code of Criminal procedure; to obviate a large number of unnecessary links, to reduce judicial costs, to reduce the material and human resources required for handling cases, and to reasonably avoid the occupation of judicial resources, In practice, it is very important to restrict and restrict the discretion of non-prosecution, and to exercise it within a reasonable scope. In our country, on the one hand, it is necessary to ensure that the procurator is in the process of hearing a case. To be able to enjoy a certain degree of discretion according to the distinction of the case and the degree of social harm, on the other hand, to control and limit the extent of the discretion in order to prevent abuse of the powers conferred by the law... In this paper, the author will start with the definition of the system of non-prosecution and the restriction mechanism of the discretion of non-prosecution in our country, through the analysis of some relatively non-prosecution cases and suspect non-prosecution cases. This paper explores the deep reasons for the non-prosecution discretion in judicial practice, that is, the legislation is not perfect and scientific, the standard of operation is not clear and unified, the supervision mechanism is merely a formality, and the subjective understanding is not deep enough. This paper puts forward some suggestions and countermeasures for the improvement and development of the system of discretion of non-prosecution in criminal proceedings in China: perfecting the legislation of the system of non-prosecution, strengthening the strict restriction on the exercise of the discretion of non-prosecution, and standardizing the system of open examination of non-prosecution cases. Promote the linkage between the people's Supervisor system and the related restriction mechanism of non-prosecution.
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.3

【相似文献】