当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

论辩护方证明责任

发布时间:2018-03-22 13:05

  本文选题:刑事诉讼 切入点:证明责任 出处:《南京师范大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:在我国法律规定和司法实践中,刑事诉讼的证明责任都是由控诉方承担,辩护方几乎不承担任何证明责任。这不利于查清事实真相和提高诉讼效率。本文对刑事辩护方承担证明责任的理论问题进行分析,通过对其他国家制度的借鉴,对我国制度构建提出了合理性建议。全文一共分为四个部分: 第一部分提出问题引发思考,论述了证明责任的基本理论,包括证明责任概念和诉讼证明的要素等。本部分还对刑事证明责任的特殊性进行了分析。 第二部分主要论述的是刑事证明责任分配,说明了刑事证明责任的客观责任由法律分配,主观责任由法官心证分配。本部分还论述了刑事证明责任分配的理论基础和刑事辩护方承担证明责任的正当性。 第三部分是对国外的辩护方证明责任制度进行考察。 第四部分对我国的刑事辩护方证明制度的现状进行分析,指出了存在的问题,并对相关制度的构建提供了方案,特别借鉴民事诉讼理论,以犯罪要件的分类为基础确定辩护方证明责任的范围。
[Abstract]:In our country's legal provisions and judicial practice, the burden of proof in criminal proceedings is borne by the complainant. The defense bears almost no burden of proof. This is not conducive to finding out the truth and improving the efficiency of the proceedings. This paper analyzes the theoretical problem of the criminal defense to bear the burden of proof, and draws lessons from the systems of other countries. This paper puts forward some reasonable suggestions for the construction of our country's system. The whole paper is divided into four parts:. In the first part, the author puts forward some questions and discusses the basic theory of burden of proof, including the concept of burden of proof and the elements of proof of litigation, etc. This part also analyzes the particularity of the responsibility of criminal proof. The second part mainly discusses the distribution of the burden of criminal proof, and explains that the objective responsibility of the burden of criminal proof is assigned by law. This part also discusses the theoretical basis of the distribution of criminal burden of proof and the legitimacy of the burden of proof of criminal defense. The third part is to investigate the burden of proof system in foreign countries. The fourth part analyzes the current situation of the criminal defense system in China, points out the existing problems, and provides a scheme for the construction of the relevant system, especially drawing lessons from the theory of civil procedure. The scope of the defence's burden of proof is determined on the basis of the classification of elements of crimes.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 戴承欢;;证明责任分配规则的本土化展开——以幽灵抗辩的应对方案为中心的考察[J];东方论坛;2010年03期

2 熊秋红;对刑事证明标准的思考——以刑事证明中的可能性和确定性为视角[J];法商研究;2003年01期

3 张义华;;举证责任的转移[J];河南社会科学;2007年06期

4 吴丹红;;刑事举证责任与“海盗抗辩”[J];人民检察;2008年19期

5 夏良田;;我国刑事被控方证明责任问题思考[J];社会科学研究;2007年04期

6 陈永生;论刑事诉讼中控方举证责任之例外[J];政法论坛;2001年05期

7 卞建林,郭志媛;刑事证明主体新论——基于证明责任的分析[J];中国刑事法杂志;2003年01期

8 宋世杰,彭海青;论刑事诉讼证明中的责任区分[J];国家检察官学院学报;2002年01期



本文编号:1648774

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1648774.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a9f27***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com