论刑事诉讼当事人主义模式的发展趋势及启示

发布时间：2018-03-22 18:25

本文选题：刑事诉讼　切入点：当事人主义　出处：《暨南大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：大陆法系的职权主义诉讼模式和英美法系的当事人主义诉讼模式是现今刑事诉讼制度中的两大诉讼模式,其中当事人主义诉讼模式是由早期的弹劾式诉讼发展而来,逐渐形成了控辩双方主导、法官超然中立的诉讼格局。本文基于对当事人主义诉讼模式的由来及特征分析,以当事人主义对权利保障的理念为出发点,分析这一诉讼模式对我国诉讼结构产生的影响,从而发现其存在的弊端并找寻其在发展过程中的改革方向。本研究主要分为六部分。绪论部分介绍了选题的背景和意义、国内外研究现状、研究内容与研究方法。第二部分介绍当事人主义诉讼模式的内涵和由来。通过对当事人主义诉讼模式的内涵进行梳理,为下文分析提供理论基础。第三部分进一步分析当事人主义诉讼模式的制度特色。重点对当事人主义诉讼模式的特色制度进行深入分析,为分析当事人主义诉讼模式的利弊打下基础。第四部分是具体谈英美国家刑事诉讼制度的演变与发展。以英美国家典型的沉默权制度和非法证据排除制度的发展为例,梳理英美国家刑事诉讼模式的演变,为我国诉讼制度的发展提供经验借鉴。第五部分是分析英美国家当事人主义诉讼结构对我国诉讼模式的影响。从我国诉讼模式的发展历程以及2012年《刑事诉讼法》修改来分析英美国家当事人主义模式对我国的影响。第六部分是展望当事人主义诉讼模式的走向。通过对当事人主义诉讼模式弊端的分析,对其改革走向做出判断。首先,要强化审前程序中法官的裁定效力,其次,限制被告人的沉默权,然后,增强法官在审判过程中的地位,最后,加强对被害人的人权保障。
[Abstract]:The functionalist litigation mode of civil law system and the litigant litigation mode of Anglo-American law system are two major litigation modes in the present criminal litigation system, among which the litigant litigation mode is developed from the early impeachment litigation. This article based on the analysis of the origin and characteristics of litigant litigation mode, taking the concept of party doctrine as the starting point of the right protection, has gradually formed the litigation pattern which is dominated by both the prosecution and the defense, and the judge is aloof and neutral. This study is divided into six parts: the introduction introduces the background and significance of the topic, and analyzes the influence of the litigation mode on the litigation structure of our country, so as to find out its drawbacks and the reform direction in the course of its development. The second part introduces the connotation and origin of litigant litigation mode. The third part further analyzes the system characteristics of litigant litigation mode. The emphasis is on the in-depth analysis of the characteristic system of litigant litigation mode. The fourth part is about the evolution and development of criminal procedure system in Anglo-American countries. Taking the development of typical silent right system and illegal evidence exclusion system in Anglo-American countries as an example, Combing the evolution of criminal procedure mode in Anglo-American countries, The fifth part is to analyze the influence of the litigation structure of Anglo-American state party doctrine on the litigation mode of our country. From the development course of litigation mode of our country and the criminal procedure law of 2012. The sixth part is to look forward to the trend of litigant litigation mode. Through the analysis of the malpractice of litigant litigation mode, First of all, it is necessary to strengthen the effectiveness of the judge's ruling in the pretrial procedure, secondly, to limit the defendant's right to silence, then to strengthen the position of the judge in the trial process, and finally, to strengthen the protection of human rights for the victims.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】