论我国非法证据排除规则的排除范围与排除结果——基于我国新《刑事诉讼法》第54条及司法解释相关规定的省思

发布时间：2018-03-23 06:26

本文选题：新《刑事诉讼法》　切入点：非法证据排除规则　出处：《法学杂志》2014年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国新《刑事诉讼法》第54条明确规定了我国非法证据排除的范围与排除后果,司法解释也作出了细化规定。但是,相关规定仍存四项不足:第一,排除物证、书证的条件存在逻辑错误。第二,应当排除的非法证据范围狭窄。第三,遗漏确立"毒树之果"排除规则。第四,已被排除的非法证据存在"借尸还魂"的可能。为了保障非法证据排除规则在司法实践中的正确适用,可以从四个方面进行完善:首先,调整排除非法物证、书证的行为条件、救济条件和结果条件的顺序。其次,将非法证据的范围扩大至全部证据种类。再次,"毒树之果"原则上不应当作为定案根据。最后,审判阶段被排除的非法证据不应当允许被重新调取。
[Abstract]:Article 54 of the new Criminal procedure Law of our country clearly stipulates the scope and consequences of the exclusion of illegal evidence in our country, and the judicial interpretation also makes detailed provisions. However, there are still four deficiencies in the relevant provisions: first, the exclusion of material evidence, Second, the scope of illegal evidence should be excluded is narrow. Third, omission to establish the "fruit of poison tree" exclusion rules. Fourth, The illegal evidence that has been excluded has the possibility of "borrowing the body and returning the soul". In order to ensure the correct application of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence in judicial practice, it can be perfected from four aspects: first, adjusting the behavior conditions of excluding illegal material evidence and documentary evidence, Order of relief conditions and result conditions. Secondly, the scope of illegal evidence should be extended to all types of evidence. Thirdly, the "fruit of the poison tree" should not, in principle, be used as the basis for a final decision... finally, Illegal evidence excluded at the trial stage should not be allowed to be re-accessed.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】