行政协议相对人不履行协议之救济困境与选择——以行政机关申请非诉执行为出路

发布时间：2018-03-25 02:08

本文选题：行政协议　切入点：救济途径　出处：《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：2015年5月1日,修改后的《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》第12条以及同步施行的最高人民法院《关于适用中华人民共和国行政诉讼法若干问题的解释》第11条,正式确立将行政协议纳入行政诉讼受案范围,这一重大修改具有里程碑式的意义,也是立法上的一大进步。但是在我国当前行政诉讼框架下行政机关恒为被告的单向救济途径,完全忽视了因行政协议具有的行政性与合同性双重属性所带来的救济途径的特殊性,不利于解决行政协议争议。在司法实践中应当积极探索行政机关在面对相对人不履行协议时的救济途径,构建相关制度实现以非诉执行方式履行行政协议,从而达到实现行政管理职能的目的。
[Abstract]:On May 1, 2015, Article 12 of the revised Administrative Litigation Law of the people's Republic of China and Article 11 of the simultaneous implementation of the Supreme people's Court on the interpretation of certain issues concerning the Application of the Administrative procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, The formal establishment of bringing administrative agreements into the scope of administrative litigation cases is of landmark significance and is also a great progress in legislation. However, under the current framework of administrative litigation in our country, the administrative organs are always the one-way relief channels for the defendants. Completely neglecting the particularity of relief channels brought about by the dual attribute of administrative agreement and contractual nature, It is unfavorable to solve the dispute of administrative agreement. In the judicial practice, we should actively explore the remedy way of administrative organ when the relative party fails to fulfill the agreement, and construct the relevant system to fulfill the administrative agreement in the form of non-litigation execution. In order to achieve the purpose of administrative functions.
【作者单位】：浙江工商大学;杭州市江干区人民法院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“非诉行政执行案件司法审查的实证分析—以浙江法院实践为例”(13YJC820064)
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】