刑事诉讼庭前会议相关制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-25 21:49

本文选题：刑事诉讼　切入点：庭前会议　出处：《内蒙古大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,我国刑事案件数量呈大幅度攀升之势,基层法院面临着有限的司法资源与不断增加的审判任务之间的矛盾,这一矛盾不但阻碍案件庭审的效率,而且致使庭审质量降低,对我国司法公信力有很大影响。为解决上述矛盾,在正式庭审之前增加一个准备程序,解决程序性问题,对该准备程序如何进行完善是刑事诉讼学界一直在讨论的问题。庭前会议制度作为我国刑事诉讼法增加的一种制度,该制度有扫清庭审障碍、梳理案件争议焦点的功能,对解决我国基层法院“案多人少”、案件久拖不决等困境有很大的帮助。庭前会议虽然是庭审的一部分,但其承担了独立的程序价值。无论是为了实体公正和程序公正,还是落实权责一致的办案责任制,均要求被告人的刑事责任在审判阶段通过庭审的方式解决,这是庭审实质化的要义,也是“庭审中心主义”的落脚点。设置庭前会议制度旨在为庭审服务,因此,完善庭前会议制度能够让司法机关更加落实和贯彻“庭审中心主义”,促进庭审的实质化。但是,我国庭前会议制度还是有很多缺陷和不足,比如庭前会议适用范围规定较粗浅,法官职能未区分容易形成预审,庭前会议缺乏实质效力,导致程序适用率较低等。笔者在本文中,对完善相关制度提出建议,希望能够丰富我国刑事诉讼法理论,并期望能为以后的司法改革提供理论帮助。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the number of criminal cases in our country has increased by a large margin. The grass-roots courts are faced with the contradiction between the limited judicial resources and the increasing judicial tasks. This contradiction not only hinders the efficiency of the trial. Moreover, the quality of the trial is reduced, which has a great impact on the credibility of the judicial system in our country. In order to resolve the above-mentioned contradictions, an additional preparatory procedure is added before the formal trial to resolve the procedural problems. How to perfect the preparatory procedure is a question that has been discussed in criminal procedure circles. As an added system of criminal procedure law in China, the system has the function of clearing up the obstacles of trial and combing the focus of disputes. It is of great help to resolve the difficulties of "more cases with fewer people" and protracted cases in our country's grass-roots courts. Although the pretrial meeting is a part of the trial, it has assumed the independent procedural value, whether for the sake of substantive justice and procedural justice. Whether to implement the responsibility system of handling cases with consistent powers and responsibilities requires that the criminal responsibility of the accused be resolved through trial at the trial stage. This is the essence of the materialization of the trial. It is also the foothold of "court centrism". The purpose of setting up the pre-court meeting system is to serve the trial. Therefore, perfecting the pretrial conference system can enable the judicial organs to implement and implement the "trial centralism" and promote the materialization of the trial. There are still many defects and deficiencies in the pretrial conference system in our country. For example, the scope of application of the pre-court meeting is relatively shallow, the judges' functions are not differentiated, it is easy to form the preliminary hearing, and the pre-court meeting lacks the substantive effect. In this paper, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the relevant system, hoping to enrich the theory of criminal procedure law of our country, and hope to provide theoretical help for the judicial reform in the future.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】