论专利侵权诉讼诉前禁令的适用及其完善

发布时间：2018-03-25 22:18

本文选题：禁令　切入点：专利侵权诉讼　出处：《兰州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着知识经济的发展,国家间的竞争已由硬实力转向软实力的竞争,在创新型科技国家,专利权的重要性日益凸显。当今中国,在不断提升科技实力的同时,也要关注如何对创新性产品进行及时有效的保护,法律体系应该更加完备,防患于未然,最大限度保护我国专利权。在我国专利权法律规定中,诉前禁令与财产保全、先予执行都是程序性、暂时性的救济措施,相互间联系紧密。但是,相对于其他两种救济措施,诉前禁令的理论研究还不够深入,有很多不足需要完善。同时,在具体司法实践中,由于我国专利制度的研究还处于起步阶段,很多内容在理论上缺乏支持,因此在实务操作上标准也是参差不齐,多靠法官的自由裁量完成,导致较多纠纷产生。为了解决这些问题,使我国的专利制度更加完善,本文进行了如下研究。第一部分：首先分析诉前禁令的基本理论。分别阐述了禁令的涵义、分类以及适用原则,并列明了我国禁令制度的自身特点,在此基础上引出我国专利侵权中诉前禁令的产生,为之后的论述铺垫了必要的理论基础,并且针对诉前禁令与其他临时性救济措施进行区分。之后,对美国和日本两国有关诉前禁令的立法规定和判例进行了简要评析,明确其优弊,再结合我国具体国情,引发对我国诉前禁令适用的思考。第二部分：结合我国诉前禁令的立法现状,从申请人、法院审查、被申请人三方面分析其在实践中存在的不足,结合相关案例,找寻现象之后的根本原因所在,进行合理分析并对症下药。第三部分：遵循应有的原则并结合国内的司法实践,针对存在的问题,在适用上完善我国专利侵权诉讼中的诉前禁令,并有针对性提出建议。
[Abstract]:With the development of knowledge economy, competition between countries has changed from hard power to soft power. In innovative science and technology countries, the importance of patent rights is becoming increasingly prominent. We should also pay attention to how to protect innovative products in a timely and effective manner. The legal system should be more complete, prevent trouble in the early stages, and maximize the protection of patent rights in our country. In the legal provisions of patent rights in our country, pre-litigation prohibition and property preservation, Pre-execution is both procedural, temporary relief measures are closely related to each other. However, compared with the other two relief measures, the theoretical study of pre-injunction is not deep enough, and there are a lot of deficiencies to be improved. In the specific judicial practice, because the research of patent system in our country is still in the initial stage, many contents lack of support in theory, so the standard in practice is also uneven, and it depends on the discretion of the judge. In order to solve these problems and make the patent system of our country more perfect, this paper has carried on the following research. The first part: firstly, it analyzes the basic theory of the injunction before suit. The classification and the applicable principles, and the characteristics of the prohibition system of our country are listed. On this basis, the emergence of pre-lawsuit injunction in patent infringement in our country is introduced, which lays the necessary theoretical foundation for the later discussion. After that, the author makes a brief analysis of the legislative provisions and cases of the United States and Japan on the pre-suit injunction, and clarifies its advantages and disadvantages, and then combines the specific conditions of our country. The second part: combined with the current legislative situation of China's pre-suit injunction, from the applicant, the court review, the respondent in the three aspects of their shortcomings in practice, combined with relevant cases, Find out the root cause after the phenomenon, carry on the reasonable analysis and give the remedy to the case. The third part: follow the principle that should have and combine with the domestic judicial practice, aim at the existing problem, To perfect the pre-litigation injunction in patent infringement litigation in our country, and put forward some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42;D925

【参考文献】