对话式司法审查权——香港特别行政区法院的实践及其前景

发布时间：2018-03-27 11:46

本文选题：司法审查权　切入点：对话理论　出处：《当代法学》2017年06期

【摘要】：香港特别行政区法院在行使司法审查权时,尤其是审查涉及人权保障立法的场合,常常秉持司法能动主义。这不仅使香港特别行政区法院很可能演变为政治纠纷的裁决者,而且客观上也可能改变《香港特别行政区基本法》既定的权力结构。尽管香港特别行政区法院是否享有司法审查权及其司法审查权的正当性一直存在质疑,但司法审查的实践已经客观存在。立足于这个事实,本文提出香港特别行政区法院可以在对话理论的基础上行使司法审查权,以达成克制香港特别行政区法院过激的司法能动之目的,使司法审查权成为配合香港特别行政区立法会和香港特别行政区政府解决问题的一种制度方法。
[Abstract]:The courts of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region, in exercising their power of judicial review, especially in cases where legislation on human rights protection is reviewed, are often guided by judicial activism. This not only makes it possible for the courts of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region to become adjudicators of political disputes, Objectively, it is also possible to change the established power structure of the basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region. Although there have been doubts about whether the courts of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region enjoy the right of judicial review and the legitimacy of the power of judicial review, However, the practice of judicial review has already existed objectively. Based on this fact, this paper suggests that the courts of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region can exercise the power of judicial review on the basis of the theory of dialogue. In order to achieve the purpose of restraining the excessive judicial initiative of the courts of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region, the power of judicial review has become a systematic method in keeping with the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region and the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region in solving problems.
【作者单位】：南开大学法学院;
【分类号】：D921.9;D926.22

【相似文献】