论民事举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量

发布时间：2018-03-28 09:58

本文选题：举证时限　切入点：法官自由裁量　出处：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：民事举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量,是法官对逾期举证的后果进行选择的一种自由度。本文从现行民事诉讼法第65条及最高人民法院新司法解释的相关规定着手,立足于现状,分析举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的问题所在,并从比较法的视角研究借鉴其他国家的相关制度,以证据失权的要件为出发点,探讨如何规范我国举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量。本文除引言和结语外,正文分为四个部分。第一部分主要是提出问题,即分析民事举证时限制度中规范法官自由裁量的必要性。在简要界定举证时限制度和法官自由裁量的基础上,分析在举证时限制度中赋予法官自由裁量的意义,指出对该制度中法官自由裁量进行规范的必要性。第二部分主要是分析问题,包括文中的第二和第三部分,即分析我国和域外其他国家举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的现状。一是分析我国的立法现状和司法现状,并指出其在立法中和司法实践中存在的问题;二是对域外其他国家的相关规定进行介绍,并指出其对我国该制度设定的借鉴意义。第三部分主要是解决问题,即从制度完善方面来设想如何规范举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量。制度完善主要从三个方面推进:一是举证时限制度本身的进一步完善;二是相应配套制度的完善;三是对举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的监督。
[Abstract]:The judge's discretion in the system of civil time limit of proof is a kind of freedom for judges to choose the consequences of late proof. This article begins with Article 65 of the current Civil procedure Law and the relevant provisions of the new judicial interpretation of the Supreme people's Court. Based on the present situation, this paper analyzes the problems of the judge's discretion in the system of the time limit of proof, and studies the relevant systems of other countries from the perspective of comparative law, taking the elements of the loss of power of evidence as the starting point. This paper, apart from the introduction and conclusion, is divided into four parts. The first part is mainly to raise questions. On the basis of briefly defining the system of the time limit of proof and the discretion of the judge, the significance of giving the judge discretion in the system of the time limit of proof is analyzed. The author points out the necessity of regulating the discretion of judges in the system. The second part is mainly about the analysis of the problems, including the second and third parts of the text. The first is to analyze the current situation of legislation and judicature in our country and other countries, and point out the problems in legislation and judicial practice. The second is to introduce the relevant provisions of other countries outside the country, and point out its reference significance for the establishment of this system in China. The third part is mainly to solve the problem. That is, how to regulate the discretion of judges in the system of the time limit of proof from the aspect of system perfection. The perfection of the system is mainly advanced from three aspects: first, the further improvement of the system of the time limit of proof, the perfection of the corresponding supporting system, the second, the perfection of the corresponding supporting system. Third, the supervision of the judge's discretion in the system of the time limit of proof.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.13

【相似文献】