论行政执法证据在刑事诉讼中的使用——基于典型案例的实证分析

发布时间：2018-03-30 17:52

本文选题：行政执法证据　切入点：证据种类　出处：《华东政法大学学报》2016年04期

【摘要】：证明对象的重叠性、行政程序的先行性、程序运行的保障性决定了行政执法证据可以在刑事诉讼中使用。由于现有立法和司法解释对行政机关未予明确、转化的行政执法证据种类模糊、审查判断程序缺失等问题,导致该制度在司法适用中存在较大争议和困惑。有必要对行政机关作扩大解释,将法律法规授权的组织、具有双重属性的办案执法部门等纳入行政机关。证据种类并不是行政执法证据在刑事诉讼中使用的关键因素,影响其证据能力的关键因素是行政执法程序。可以在刑事诉讼中使用的行政执法证据,不仅包括物证、书证、电子数据和视听资料,还应包括勘验笔录、现场笔录、鉴定意见以及当事人达成合意的证人证言、当事人陈述等言词证据。需明确行政执法证据转化的司法审查标准和方式,以确保其具有相应的证据能力和证明力。
[Abstract]:The overlapping of the object of proof, the antecedence of the administrative procedure and the guarantee of the operation of the procedure determine that the evidence of administrative law enforcement can be used in criminal proceedings. The types of transformed administrative law enforcement evidence are vague, and the lack of examination and judgment procedure leads to greater controversy and confusion in the judicial application of the system. It is necessary to expand the interpretation of the administrative organs and to organize the organizations authorized by laws and regulations. The type of evidence is not the key factor for the use of administrative law enforcement evidence in criminal proceedings. The key factor affecting its evidentiary ability is the administrative law enforcement procedure. The administrative law enforcement evidence that can be used in criminal proceedings includes not only material evidence, documentary evidence, electronic data and audio-visual materials, but also records of an inquest and a record of the scene. It is necessary to clarify the standards and methods of judicial review of the transformation of administrative law enforcement evidence in order to ensure its corresponding evidentiary capacity and power of proof.
【作者单位】：国家"2011计划司法文明协同创新中心";吉林大学法学院;吉林大学司法数据应用研究中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“刑事简易程序实证研究”(项目号15CFX031) 吉林省高校人文社会科学研究规划项目“吉林省环境犯罪治理的困境与出路”(吉教科文合字2016]第641号) 吉林大学廉政建设专项研究课题“纪检监察与刑事司法衔接机制研究”(项目号2014LZY017)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】