论行政诉讼当事人的法律地位平等与保护
发布时间:2018-03-31 04:07
本文选题:法律地位 切入点:诉权 出处:《青岛大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:当事人的法律地位无论在民事诉讼还是在行政诉讼中都应当是平等的,但是行政诉讼当事人的法律地位平等应当着重强调,因为行政诉讼当事人身份差异的悬殊性,以及我国司法制度的特点,导致法律地位平等的天平极易倾斜,很多时候,会出现不平等的现象,表现在司法实践中,就会出现诉权问题,执行问题等,所以十分有必要来着重规范。然而,现行行政诉讼法对此问题的规定过于原则,缺乏相应的实施措施和救济措施,因此十分有必要对这一原则进行充实,使行政诉讼当事人的法律地位真正达到平等,至少尽可能使行政诉讼摆脱行政机关的干预。规范行政诉讼当事人的法律地位,不仅有利于解决诉权问题和执行问题,还有利于保护原告的合法利益,防止原告的合法权益遭受不法行为的伤害,有利于提高行政机关依法行政的水平,有利于法院依法审判。
[Abstract]:The parties' legal status should be equal in both civil and administrative proceedings, but the equal legal status of the parties in administrative proceedings should be emphasized because of the wide disparity in the identity of the parties in administrative proceedings. As well as the characteristics of our judicial system, the balance of equality of legal status is easily tilted. In many cases, there will be inequality. In judicial practice, there will be problems such as the right of action, the issue of enforcement, and so on. Therefore, it is very necessary to focus on standardization. However, the provisions of the current administrative procedure law on this issue are too principled and lack corresponding implementation measures and relief measures. Therefore, it is very necessary to enrich this principle. To make the legal status of the parties in administrative litigation truly equal, at least to get rid of the interference of the administrative organs as far as possible, to standardize the legal status of the parties in administrative litigation is not only conducive to solving the problem of litigation rights and enforcement, It also helps to protect the legitimate interests of the plaintiff, prevent the plaintiff's legitimate rights and interests from being harmed by illegal acts, improve the level of administrative organs' administration according to law, and benefit the court to try according to law.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 马怀德,解志勇;行政诉讼案件执行难的现状及对策——兼论建立行政法院的必要性与可行性[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1999年06期
2 马怀德,张红;行政争议与民事争议的交织与处理[J];法商研究;2003年04期
3 马骏驹,聂德宗;当前我国司法制度存在的问题与改进对策[J];法学评论;1998年06期
4 李金刚;诉讼救济途径的选择:行政与民事——从一起房地产行政案件引发的思考[J];法学;2003年01期
5 ;二十一世纪司法制度面临的基本课题[J];法学;1998年12期
6 杨海坤,何薇;关于中国行政法(学)理论基础问题的讨论[J];广播电视大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年04期
7 杨小君;行政诉讼强制执行措施再思考[J];行政法学研究;2003年03期
8 王胜俊;;在纪念《行政诉讼法》颁布20周年座谈会上的讲话[J];行政法学研究;2009年03期
9 周郁昌;行政诉讼第三人辨析[J];政法论丛;2001年04期
10 罗豪才;袁曙宏;李文栋;;现代行政法的理论基础——论行政机关与相对一方的权利义务平衡[J];中国法学;1993年01期
,本文编号:1689061
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1689061.html