我国民事诉讼中专家辅助人制度之研究

发布时间：2018-04-01 10:03

本文选题：专家辅助人　切入点：专家　出处：《华南理工大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：2012年8月，新修订的民事诉讼法明确规定了当事人有权申请具有专门知识的人出庭对涉案的专业问题提出意见。这样的立法举措是因为：一方面，越来越多涉及专业问题的纠纷涌入法院，法官对鉴定结论的高度依赖使得当事人对审判结果多有不满，损害了是司法正义和司法权威；另一方面，随着当事人诉讼权利意识的苏醒，在案件审理的过程中，当事人更加注重是否得到公平的待遇。引入专家辅助人制度使得当事人拥有足以抗衡鉴定意见的机会；最后，在民事诉讼更加注重当事人主义的实现时，专家辅助人制度能够更好地平衡双方当事人的利益，实现有效的对抗。但是，由于法律对专家辅助人制度只进行了原则性规定，笔者从专家辅助人的概念出发，深入分析探讨专家辅助人的制度建设。本文主要分为以下四个部分：第一部分，对我国民事诉讼中专家辅助人制度的进行概述。首先，对专家辅助人的概念及其特征进行分析和论述。然后，深入分析我国专家辅助人制度的立法背景，包括当事人不能对涉案的专业问题进行有效分析、当事人无法对鉴定意见作出有效质证等。再次，本文将立法内容出发，，列举我国现行法律中涉及专家辅助人的内容。最后，在这立法背景下，进一步探讨专家辅助人制度存在的问题。第二部分，深入研究专家辅助人的诉讼地位及作用，这是本文的重点部分。由于我国立法还没明确专家辅助人的诉讼地位，学界与司法界对专家辅助人的具体诉讼地位有不同看法，因此，明确专家辅助人的诉讼地位显得尤其重要。为此，笔者也提出了关于专家辅助人诉讼地位的看法，并对此进行了详细的说明。最后，在确定专家辅助人诉讼地位的基础上，明确提出专家辅助人意见的作用。第三部分，深入探究专家辅助人制度的内容，这也是本文的重要部分。本章主要从实体和程序两方面来论述专家辅助人制度的内容。在具体规范方面，主要论述了专家辅助人资格与审查、权利与义务、专家辅助人的法律责任等。这为下面的程序构建打下了坚实的基础。在方式和程序方面，主要是专家辅助人制度的启动、专家辅助人的退出与救济及其证据的可采性等方面进行详细的论述。第四部分，对完善我国专家辅助人制度的其他保障性措施提出建议。首先，要保障专家辅助人的知情权与参与权；其次，要加强专家辅助人的行业管理；再次，重视专家辅助人的人身安全保障；第四，要明确专家辅助人的费用标准。
[Abstract]:In August 2012, the newly amended Code of Civil procedure expressly provided that the parties had the right to apply for a person with expertise to appear in court to comment on the professional issues involved.Such legislative measures are: on the one hand, more and more disputes involving professional issues pour into the court, and judges rely heavily on the conclusion of the appraisal, which makes the parties dissatisfied with the trial results, and damages the judicial justice and judicial authority;On the other hand, with the awakening of litigant's right consciousness, the litigants pay more attention to fair treatment.The introduction of the expert Auxiliary system enables the parties to have sufficient opportunities to counteract the opinions of the appraisal. Finally, when the civil litigation pays more attention to the realization of litigant doctrine, the expert Auxiliary system can better balance the interests of both parties.To achieve effective confrontation.However, since the law only provides for the system of expert assistant in principle, the author proceeds from the concept of expert assistant, and deeply analyzes and discusses the system construction of expert assistant.This paper is divided into the following four parts:The first part is an overview of the system of expert auxiliaries in civil litigation in China.First of all, the concept and characteristics of expert assistant are analyzed and discussed.Then, the author deeply analyzes the legislative background of our country's expert assistant system, including that the parties cannot effectively analyze the professional problems involved in the case, and the parties cannot make effective cross-examination of the appraisal opinions and so on.Thirdly, this paper enumerates the contents of the current law of our country which involve the expert assistant.Finally, under this legislative background, further discusses the question which the expert assistant person system exists.In the second part, the author deeply studies the action status and function of the expert assistant, which is the key part of this paper.Due to the fact that the litigation status of the expert assistant is not clear in our country's legislation, the academic and judicial circles have different views on the specific litigation status of the expert assistant, so it is particularly important to clarify the litigation status of the expert assistant.Therefore, the author also puts forward the views on the status of the expert assistant litigant, and explains it in detail.Finally, on the basis of determining the litigation status of the expert assistant, the role of the expert assistant opinion is clearly put forward.The third part explores the content of expert assistant system, which is also an important part of this paper.This chapter mainly discusses the content of expert assistant system from two aspects of entity and procedure.In the specific specification, it mainly discusses the qualification and examination, rights and obligations, the legal responsibility of the expert assistant and so on.This lays a solid foundation for the following program building.In the aspect of way and procedure, it mainly discusses the initiation of expert assistant system, the withdrawal and relief of expert assistant and the admissibility of evidence.The fourth part, to perfect our country expert assistant person system other safeguard measure puts forward the proposal.First of all, to protect the right to know and participate in the right of expert assistant; secondly, to strengthen the industry management of expert assistant; thirdly, to attach importance to the personal security of expert assistant; fourth, to make clear the cost standard of expert assistant.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】