讯问同步录音录像制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-01 06:19

本文选题：刑事诉讼　切入点：讯问　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：修订后的《刑事诉讼法》在第121条规定:"侦查人员在讯问犯罪嫌疑人的时候,可以对讯问过程进行录音或者录像,对于可能判处无期徒刑、死刑的案件或者其他重大犯罪案件,应当对讯问过程进行录音或者录像。"由此讯问同步录音录像制度在我国确立。检察机关、公安机关分别制定了本系统讯问同步录音录像的实施细则,但这些制度因各方面的原因在实际中并未严格执行,而且制度设计上还有诸多需要完善的地方,因此有必要在刑事司法改革的大环境下对讯问同步录音录像制度进行研究。本文立足于我国现有的讯问同步录音录像制度,对其实际运行状况进行了分析、研判,并在网络技术和云存储技术飞速发展的社会大背景下,探索适合当前国情的讯问同步录音录像制度设计和具体规定。本文共分为四个部分:第一部分探讨讯问同步录音录像制度确立的必要性,通过分析讯问录音录像确立的原因,以及对犯罪嫌疑人、讯问人、公诉人员、审判人员及辩护人等各刑事诉讼参与方的作用,确立讯问录音录像的必要性。第二部分分析讯问录音录像制度的立法演进,梳理了 2012年《刑事诉讼法》修订前检察机关、公安机关对讯问录音录像制度的探索,以及《刑事诉讼法》正式确立该制度后检察机关、公安机关陆续出台的相关规定。第三部分分析讯问录音录像制度落实中出现的主要问题,如部分录制规定不合理,全程录制实现困难,保管制度不完善,录制过程缺乏监督,录制效果不佳等。从法律层面、技术层面和人员经费三方面对产生上述问题的原因进行了分析。第四部分是完善我国讯问录音录像制度的意见建议,主要是完善法律规定,提升讯问同步录音录像的管理水平,运用科技方法实现全面、全程、全部录制。
[Abstract]:Article 121 of the revised Code of Criminal procedure stipulates: "when interrogating a criminal suspect, an investigator may make audio or video recordings of the interrogation process, and in cases that may be sentenced to life imprisonment, the death penalty or other serious crimes," The system of simultaneous audio and video recording of interrogation shall be established in China. The procuratorial organ and the public security organ have separately formulated the detailed rules for the implementation of the simultaneous audio and video recording of the interrogation in this system. However, these systems have not been strictly implemented in practice for various reasons, and there are still many areas that need to be improved in the design of the system. Therefore, it is necessary to study the synchronous audio and video recording system of interrogation under the circumstances of criminal judicial reform. And under the background of the rapid development of network technology and cloud storage technology, This paper is divided into four parts: the first part discusses the necessity of the establishment of interrogation synchronous audio and video recording system, and analyzes the reasons for the establishment of interrogation audio and video recording system. As well as the role of criminal suspects, interrogators, public prosecutors, judges and defenders, and so on, to establish the necessity of audiovisual recording of interrogation. The second part analyzes the legislative evolution of audiovisual recording system of interrogation. Combing the procuratorial organs before the revision of the Criminal procedure Law in 2012, the exploration of the audio and video recording system of interrogations by the public security organs, and the procuratorial organs after the formal establishment of the system in the Criminal procedure Law, The third part analyzes the main problems in the implementation of the audiovisual recording system for questioning, such as unreasonable recording regulations, difficulties in realizing the whole recording process, imperfect custody system, and lack of supervision over the recording process. The reasons for the above problems are analyzed from the legal level, the technical level and the personnel funds. The fourth part is the suggestions to perfect the audiovisual recording system of interrogation in our country, mainly to perfect the legal provisions. Improve the management level of simultaneous audio and video recording of interrogations, and use scientific and technological methods to achieve full, full and complete recording.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】