刑事庭前会议制度的适用及完善

发布时间：2018-04-01 23:35

本文选题：庭前会议制度　切入点：司法实践　出处：《甘肃政法学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：2012《刑事诉讼法》规定的庭前会议是案件进入法院至庭审前的中间程序,从新《刑事诉讼法》实施以来,庭前会议制度的落实并非一帆风顺,部分学者认为庭前会议解决了阻碍庭审顺利进行的问题,在有效监管下提升了刑事审判的效率与质量;部分学者则认为庭前会议的规定不明确,适用的案件范围过于宽泛,违反了庭审中心主义的原则。本文认为庭前会议能提升庭审效率和质量、保障被告人权利,使案件审判更加公平、公正。论文以案例分析的形式,选取一个少数民族地区的基层法院从2013年1月1日《刑事诉讼法》实施以来至2016年8月1日前,所有召开过庭前会议的刑事案件作为研究对象。笔者调研的基层法院在这段时间里只召开过三次庭前会议,涉及三类案件,第一件是经济类诈骗案件;第二件是涉及多名被告人的打架斗殴案件;第三件因为被告人不服第一审判决,而上诉到M市中级人民法院,所以笔者未能如愿的调查有关庭前会议的资料。论文分为三部分,第一部分详述案例,分析庭前会议制度在实践中的运用情况及不足,论述庭前会议的法律价值,从理论和实践的角度解读庭前会议的不足之处;第二部分从理论和法律规定中探讨具有中国特色的庭前会议制度结构,解读中国特色庭前会议制度的法律构成,阐明庭前会议制度在法律上的优点与不足;第三部分分析庭前会议制度在实践中的适用现状,从理论和实践的维度发现庭前会议的问题,并针对问题提出解决这些问题的措施,最后得出完善庭前会议制度的措施和建议。
[Abstract]:The pretrial meeting stipulated in the 2012 Criminal procedure Law is the intermediate procedure between the entry of the case into the court and the trial before the trial. Since the implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law, the implementation of the pretrial conference system has not been smooth sailing. Some scholars believe that the pretrial meeting solves the problems that hinder the smooth conduct of the trial, and improves the efficiency and quality of the criminal trial under effective supervision. Some scholars believe that the provisions of the pre-trial meeting are not clear and the scope of cases applied is too broad. This paper holds that the pretrial conference can improve the efficiency and quality of the trial, protect the rights of the defendant, and make the trial more fair and just. Selecting a grass-roots court in an ethnic minority area from the implementation of the Criminal procedure Code on 1 January 2013 to 1 August 2016, All the criminal cases that have held the pretrial conference as the research object. The basic court of the author has held only three pre-court meetings in this period, involving three kinds of cases, the first one is the economic fraud case; The second is a fight case involving a number of defendants; the third is because the accused appealed to the M City Intermediate people's Court against the verdict of first instance, so the author failed to investigate the materials of the pre-court meeting as intended. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part elaborates the case, analyzes the application and insufficiency of the pre-court meeting system in practice, discusses the legal value of the pre-court meeting, and interprets the deficiency of the pre-court meeting from the angle of theory and practice. The second part discusses the structure of the pre-court conference system with Chinese characteristics from the theory and the legal provisions, interprets the legal constitution of the pre-court conference system with Chinese characteristics, and clarifies the advantages and disadvantages of the pre-court conference system. The third part analyzes the current situation of the application of the pre-court meeting system in practice, finds out the problems of the pre-court meeting from the perspective of theory and practice, and puts forward some measures to solve these problems. Finally, the measures and suggestions to perfect the pre-court conference system are obtained.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】