刑事和解中被害人权利保障制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-02 02:35

本文选题：刑事和解　切入点：被害人　出处：《兰州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：上世纪70年代起,刑事和解成为世界范围内全新的司法理念和司法范式,通过刑事和解的方式解决纠纷的司法实践在西方发达国家中普遍展开。近年内,我国的理论工作者开始了对刑事和解制度的研究和探讨,并在全国各地开展了刑事和解的实践活动。随着和谐社会的思想日益深入人心,宽严相济刑事政策的不断贯彻,和谐刑事司法理念也逐渐得以培育和形成,刑事和解正是在这样一种客观形势下出现的。刑事和解的出现给双方当事人提供了一种全新的纠纷解决方式,在一定程度上惩罚被告人外,更重要的是寻求到了一种效率高、成本低、效果好的纠纷处理机制,体现了化解社会矛盾,保护被害人利益,教育感化犯罪嫌疑人、被告人和节约诉讼资源等多元价值;体现了我国刑事司法对被害人利益的关注和单纯报应刑罚观的反思;体现了被害人的刑事诉讼当事人地位,保障了被害人的尊严,让被害人不再成为“被刑事司法遗忘的人”。通过被害人与加害人之间的对话协商,被害人可以提出自己的赔偿要求,减轻自己的被害压力,在物质和精神方面更好地保障被害人的权益。随着刑事立法的不断完善,有关刑事和解的规定也不断丰富,但是在制度运行中还有很多瑕疵与不足,刑事和解中被害人权利保障还存在诸多缺陷,因此本文在前人的研究基础上,通过阅读大量相关的著作及学术论文,分析刑事和解中被害人权利保障的不足及成因,并提出相应的对策与建议,以此更好地保障被害人的权利。本文主要包括四章内容,大概3万多字。第一章是对刑事和解与被害人权利保障的概述,首先主要介绍了刑事和解的概念、特点、性质、功能以及刑事和解的理论基础,其次介绍了刑事被害人的含义、主要特征以及保障刑事被害人权利的理论基础。第二章分析了刑事和解中被害人权利保障的特殊性以及被害人在刑事和解中享有的权利。第三章分析了刑事和解中被害人权利保障的不足之处及成因。第四章在第三章的基础上提出完善被害人权利保障的具体对策。
[Abstract]:Since the 1970s, criminal reconciliation has become a new judicial concept and judicial paradigm in the world. The judicial practice of resolving disputes by means of criminal reconciliation has been widely carried out in western developed countries in recent years. Our country's theorists have begun to study and discuss the system of criminal reconciliation, and have carried out practical activities of criminal reconciliation in various parts of the country. With the idea of a harmonious society gaining more and more people's support, the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity has been continuously implemented. The concept of harmonious criminal justice has been gradually cultivated and formed, and criminal reconciliation has emerged under such an objective situation. The appearance of criminal reconciliation provides a new way for the parties to resolve disputes. In addition to punishing the accused to a certain extent, it is more important to seek a dispute settlement mechanism with high efficiency, low cost and good effect, which embodies the solution of social contradictions, the protection of the interests of the victims, and the education of probation suspects. The multiple values such as defendant and saving litigation resources reflect the concern of our criminal justice to the interests of the victim and the reflection of the concept of simple retribution penalty, and embody the position of the criminal litigant of the victim and the protection of the dignity of the victim. By making victims no longer "forgotten by criminal justice". Through dialogue and consultation between victims and perpetrators, victims can make their own claims for reparations and reduce their victimization pressure, Better protect the rights and interests of victims in the material and spiritual aspects. With the continuous improvement of criminal legislation, the provisions on criminal reconciliation are also constantly enriched, but there are still many flaws and deficiencies in the operation of the system. There are still many defects in the protection of victims' rights in criminal reconciliation. Therefore, based on the previous studies, this paper analyzes the deficiency and causes of the protection of victims' rights in criminal reconciliation by reading a large number of relevant works and academic papers. And put forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions, so as to better protect the rights of victims. This paper mainly includes four chapters, about 30,000 words. The first chapter is an overview of criminal reconciliation and the protection of victims' rights. First of all, it introduces the concept, characteristics, nature, function and theoretical basis of criminal reconciliation, and then introduces the meaning of criminal victim. The second chapter analyzes the particularity of the protection of victims' rights in criminal reconciliation and the rights enjoyed by victims in criminal reconciliation. The third chapter analyzes the criminal reconciliation. The fourth chapter puts forward the concrete countermeasures to perfect the protection of victims' rights on the basis of the third chapter.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】