当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物独立没收问题研究

发布时间:2018-04-03 02:41

  本文选题:恐怖活动犯罪 切入点:独立没收 出处:《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着国际反恐的高压态势,恐怖活动犯罪的隐蔽性逐渐增强,犯罪往往通过数人或者一人实施,但却给公民带来极大的恐慌,尤其在近期的欧洲,恐怖活动犯罪频发。随着各国没收理论的不断发展,针对涉案财物的没收不再限于因犯罪所得的收益,需要没收的对象已经从收益逐渐的延伸到违禁品、犯罪所用财物以及组成犯罪行为之物等涉案财物。明确恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物没收的性质,剖析恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物独立没收的对象,探讨目前法律存在的不足并针对性的提出相应的建议,不仅利于打击恐怖活动犯罪,还能最大限度的保护犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的合法权利,从而实现恐怖活动犯罪的打击和人权的维护。文章约三万字,由四部分组成。第一部分是恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物独立没收的概念和性质。合理界定恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物独立没收的相关概念是研究的前提,通过相关概念的对比和辨析,明确文章研究的范围。对恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物独立没收的性质进行分析,总结以往学者对涉案财物没收性质的学术分析,最后提出自己的观点。第二部分是对恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物独立没收必要性和可行性的探讨。刑事诉讼法第280条为没收恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物独立没收提供了法律基础,我国反恐态势决定了我国对恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物没收必须严格实施。从已经出台的《刑法修正案九》以及《反恐法》可见,恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物独立没收保障体系越来越完善。第三部分是明确恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物独立没收的对象。通过对刑法和刑事诉讼法法律规定的理顺,加之对相关概念的解释可以总结出对恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物独立没收对象主要有三类:一是恐怖活动犯罪中的违禁品;二是恐怖活动犯罪中的违法所得;三是实施恐怖活动犯罪的本人财物。第四部分是在实体和程序两个角度提出完善恐怖活动犯罪涉案财物独立没收的建议。由于恐怖活动犯罪打击的力度大,涉及的财物多,案情相对复杂,因此在没收涉案财物时,没收的理念,证明标准以及利害关系人的保护都需要进一步完善。
[Abstract]:With the high pressure of international anti-terrorism, the concealment of terrorist activities is gradually enhanced. The crime is often carried out by several people or one person, but it brings great panic to the citizens, especially in recent Europe, the crime of terrorist activities occurs frequently.With the continuous development of confiscation theory in various countries, the confiscation of property involved in the case is no longer limited to the proceeds of crime, and the objects that need to be confiscated have gradually extended from proceeds to contraband.The property used in the crime and the property which constitutes the criminal act, etc.To clarify the nature of the confiscation of property involved in terrorist crimes, to analyze the objects of independent confiscation of property involved in terrorist crimes, to explore the shortcomings of current laws and to put forward corresponding suggestions, is not only conducive to cracking down on crimes of terrorist activities,It can also protect the legal rights of criminal suspects and defendants to the maximum extent, thus realizing the fight against terrorist activities and the protection of human rights.The article is about 30,000 words and consists of four parts.The first part is the concept and nature of the independent confiscation of property involved in terrorist crimes.It is the premise of the study to reasonably define the related concepts of the independent confiscation of property involved in the terrorist crime. Through the contrast and differentiation of the relevant concepts, the scope of the article is clarified.This paper analyzes the nature of the independent confiscation of property involved in terrorist crime, summarizes the academic analysis of the nature of property confiscation involved in the case by scholars in the past, and finally puts forward his own views.The second part discusses the necessity and feasibility of independent confiscation of property involved in terrorist activities.Article 280 of the Criminal procedure Law provides a legal basis for the confiscation of property involved in terrorist activities, and the situation of anti-terrorism in our country determines that the confiscation of property involved in terrorist crimes must be strictly carried out in our country.From the "Criminal Law Amendment 9" and the Anti-Terrorism Law, we can see that the system of independently confiscating the property involved in terrorist activities is becoming more and more perfect.The third part is to clarify the object of independent confiscation of property involved in terrorist activities.Through the straightening out of the criminal law and the criminal procedure law, together with the explanation of the related concepts, it can be concluded that there are three main objects of independent confiscation of the property involved in the crime of terrorist activity: first, the contraband in the crime of terrorist activity;The second is the illegal proceeds of the terrorist crime, and the third is the personal property of the terrorist crime.In the fourth part, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the confiscation of the property involved in terrorist crime from the two angles of entity and procedure.Because the crime of terrorist activities has a strong strike, involving a lot of property, the case is relatively complex, so when confiscating the property involved, the concept of confiscation, the standard of proof and the protection of interested parties all need to be further improved.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 康均心;官尔杰;刘猛;;海峡两岸反恐法律比较研究[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2015年05期

2 陈卫东;李响;;论违法所得没收特别程序中的利害关系人[J];政法论坛;2015年01期

3 邓立军;;违法所得特别没收程序的潜在风险与控制[J];法学评论;2015年01期

4 张小玲;;我国恐怖活动案件违法所得没收程序探讨[J];江淮论坛;2014年06期

5 邵劭;;特别没收程序的理论和适用问题探析[J];法商研究;2014年04期

6 黄风;;论“没收个人全部财产”刑罚的废止——以追缴犯罪资产的国际合作为视角[J];法商研究;2014年01期

7 熊秋红;;从特别没收程序的性质看制度完善[J];法学;2013年09期

8 初殿清;;违法所得没收特别程序的性质与案件范围[J];法学杂志;2013年08期

9 孙煜华;;涉案财产没收程序如何才能经受宪法拷问[J];法学;2012年06期

10 张明楷;;论刑法中的没收[J];法学家;2012年03期

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 杨婷婷;我国刑法中特别没收的对象研究[D];西南政法大学;2015年

2 董文;日本刑法中的没收制度研究[D];山东大学;2014年

3 刘溉;我国刑事没收制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2013年

4 张婕;我国未经定罪财产没收制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2012年



本文编号:1703291

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1703291.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户88f41***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com