我国第三人撤销之诉探究

发布时间：2018-04-04 00:40

本文选题：第三人撤销之诉　切入点：第三人　出处：《广东财经大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：第三人撤销之诉，是指未曾参加诉讼的第三人，以原诉当事人为共同被告，旨在全部或部分地改变和撤销错误且侵害其民事权益的、生效的判决、裁定、调解书所确定的法律状态或权利关系，而向法院提起的诉讼。它体现了程序保障的要求，通过赋予未参加诉讼的第三人程序权，弥补裁判效力扩张对他们的影响，以维护他们的实体权益；同时，它也为了遏制当事人恶意制造虚假诉讼侵害第三人，体现了纠正实体错误，实现实体正义的要求。当前，我国《民事诉讼法》虽然确立了第三人撤销之诉制度，但立法的粗疏可能导致实践中出现各种问题，难以实现立法目的。为此，应该在我国的司法实践经验的基础上，结合实际需要，参考域外相关制度的立法，在诉讼主体，立案机制，起诉期限和审判规则等方面进一步具体明确，以完善我国的第三人撤销之诉制度。同时，整合我国现有的相关制度，包括第三人参加诉讼制度、案外人执行异议制度以及案外人申请再审制度，以进一步完善对第三人的程序保障。本论文除前言、结语外，共有三章，，围绕我国第三人撤销之诉这一主题展开，对其进行解释，分析以及提出改进意见。各部分主要内容如下：前言：概说我国的第三人撤销之诉，交代本文的写作背景与探讨范畴。第一章：对我国第三人撤销之诉作一般考察。第二章：对我国默示协议管辖的现状分析。对法律条文进行解读，并分析其中的立法和实践问题，提出可能导致的后果。第三章：论述了完善我国第三人撤销之诉的具体构想。结语：简要总结本文探讨内容并指出本文的不足之处。
[Abstract]:The action of revocation by a third party refers to a judgment or order in force by a third person who has not participated in the proceedings, in which the original litigant is the co-defendant, whose purpose is to alter and revoke, in whole or in part, the mistake and infringe upon his civil rights and interests,A legal state or relationship of rights established by a conciliation document, and an action brought in a court of law.It embodies the requirements of procedural safeguards, by granting procedural rights to third parties who do not participate in the proceedings, to make up for the impact of the expansion of the effectiveness of the referee on them, in order to safeguard their substantive rights and interests; at the same time,It also aims at deterring the third party from maliciously making false lawsuit against the third party, which reflects the requirement of correcting entity error and realizing substantial justice.At present, China's Civil procedure Law has established the system of the third party's revocation, but the carelessness of legislation may lead to various problems in practice, and it is difficult to achieve the legislative purpose.Therefore, on the basis of our country's judicial practice experience and in the light of the actual needs, we should refer to the legislation of relevant extraterritorial systems, and further specify the subject of the proceedings, the mechanism of filing the case, the duration of the prosecution and the rules of the trial, etc.In order to improve our third party to withdraw the system of action.At the same time, we should integrate the existing relevant systems of our country, including the system of the third party participating in the lawsuit, the system of the outsider executing the dissent and the system of the application for retrial of the outsider in the case, so as to further perfect the procedural protection for the third party.In addition to the preface and conclusion, this thesis consists of three chapters, which focus on the subject of the third party's revocation in China, explain, analyze and put forward some suggestions for improvement.The main parts are as follows:Introduction: a summary of the third party's action of withdrawal in our country, explain the writing background and discussion category of this article.Chapter one: a general investigation of the third party's revocation in our country.Chapter two: the analysis of the current situation of implied agreement jurisdiction in China.This paper interprets the legal provisions, analyzes the legislative and practical problems, and puts forward the possible consequences.Chapter three: discuss the concrete conception of perfecting the third party's revocation action in our country.Conclusion: briefly summarize the content of this paper and point out the shortcomings of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】