上诉案件开庭范围实证分析

发布时间：2018-04-04 02:57

本文选题：二审开庭范围　切入点：上诉案件开庭范围　出处：《国家检察官学院学报》2013年03期

【摘要】：新刑事诉讼法明确了二审开庭的范围,解决了实践难题,同时兼顾了诉讼效率。司法实践中上诉案件开庭数量激增,但改判率很低,法院对开庭必要性缺乏审查,一些上诉后又撤诉的案件开庭审理不符合诉讼经济原则,而未开庭审理的案件改判率较高,检察机关的监督存在盲区。上诉案件审理方式的选择应根据案件的具体情况充分考虑诉讼效率和公正的关系,原则上讲,应当将涉及事实认定或容易出现错误、需要检察机关监督的上诉案件纳入开庭审理的范围,其他不开庭审理一般也不会出现错误的案件则无需开庭审理。
[Abstract]:The new criminal procedure law clarifies the scope of the second trial, solves the practical problems and takes into account the efficiency of the proceedings.In judicial practice, the number of appellate cases has increased sharply, but the rate of revision is very low. The courts lack a review of the necessity of court sittings, and some cases that are withdrawn after appeal do not conform to the economic principle of litigation, while those that do not sit in court have a higher rate of revision.There are blind areas in the supervision of procuratorial organs.The choice of the way of hearing an appeal case should take full account of the relationship between the efficiency and fairness of the proceedings according to the specific circumstances of the case. In principle, it should involve the determination of facts or be prone to errors,The appeal cases which need the supervision of the procuratorial organ are included in the scope of the court session, while the other cases which do not normally have errors in the trial do not need to be heard at the court session.
【作者单位】：北京市人民检察院第一分院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】