变迁中的英美补强规则

发布时间：2018-04-04 09:06

本文选题：补强规则　切入点：罪体　出处：《环球法律评论》2017年05期

【摘要】：尽管英国和美国的补强规则具有同源性,但却演绎出迥异的发展模式。发端于英国普通法实践的补强规则,在当下的英国已基本被废除,裁量性警告作为替代性措施在发挥作用。在美国则发展出两种形态的补强规则,尽管强奸案件的补强规则基本被废除,但针对庭外供述的补强规则依然存在,并深刻影响着当下的司法实践。英美补强规则的变迁对于我们具有重要的启示意义,全景展示、描述完整的英美证据法生态,能够为理论分析和改革建言奠定坚实的基础。研判补强规则变迁背后的原因,挖掘影响变迁的深层因素,能够在平衡公共权力和个人权利以及因应本土刑事司法文化等方面,为我国补强规则的完善提供参考。
[Abstract]:Although the complementary rules of the United Kingdom and the United States are homologous, they deduce a very different development model.The reinforcement rule, which originated in the English common law practice, has been basically abolished in the present Britain, and discretionary warning plays an important role as an alternative measure.In the United States, two kinds of reinforcement rules have been developed. Although the reinforcement rules in rape cases are basically abolished, the reinforcement rules for out-of-court confessions still exist and have a profound impact on the current judicial practice.The change of Anglo-American reinforcement rules is of great significance to us. The panoramic display and description of the complete Anglo-American evidence law ecology can lay a solid foundation for theoretical analysis and reform.To study the reasons behind the change of the reinforcement rules and dig out the deep factors that affect the changes can provide reference for the perfection of the reinforcement rules in our country in the aspects of balancing public power and individual rights and responding to the local criminal judicial culture.
【作者单位】： 2011计划司法文明协同创新中心、中国政法大学证据科学研究院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“认罪认罚从宽制度实施中的证据问题研究”(17BFX062) 教育部后期资助项目“证明力规则研究”(13JHQ021)的研究成果
【分类号】：D915.3

【相似文献】