我国民商事仲裁的民间性分析

发布时间：2018-04-04 15:04

本文选题：仲裁制度　切入点：民间性　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：仲裁作为解决民商事纠纷的一种途径,是指发生争议的双方当事人根据其在争议发生前或争议发生后所达成的协议,自愿将该争议提交中立的第三者进行裁判的争议制度和方式。在我国,仲裁作为一项从西方移植的法律制度,发展至今,可以说取得了巨大的成绩。我国的民商事仲裁现行模式的正式确立应以1994年8月31日《中华人民共和国仲裁法》的正式颁布为界。在这一时刻,我国的民商事仲裁制度的民间性终于起步。自《仲裁法》正式实施之日起,我国民商事仲裁制度建设进入了快车道,关于仲裁制度、仲裁理论研究也不断上升。《仲裁法》的制定,为我国仲裁制度和仲裁机构的发展形成了法律基础,在我国仲裁发展史起到了里程碑的作用,标志着中国仲裁制度建设向着规范化、国际化的方向迈进,极大推进了仲裁制度建设。但是,在仲裁理论研究领域,理论界绝大多数的学者对我国民商事仲裁制度的民间性给予了很大的质疑,呼吁"去行政化",即仲裁制度应当是纯民间性,应当放弃当前的行政色彩,并对现在的仲裁制度性质和仲裁机构组成方式提出了很多脱离中国仲裁现状的批评意见,这并不利于中国仲裁制度的发展。本文从分析我国民商事仲裁制度的民间性入手,首先阐述了我国现阶段民商事仲裁制度现状,剖析我国现阶段民商事仲裁制度行政化和民间性的争议根源。其次,一是重点分析我国现阶段民商事仲裁制度行政色彩的成因,主要是分析我国现阶段民商事仲裁制度产生的基础、法治环境对仲裁制度的影响和目前仲裁机构管理模式;二是主要分析当事人的自愿性对我国现阶段民商事仲裁制度民间性特点所起到的决定性作用,进一步明确当事人的自愿性是仲裁制度民间性最直接的元素,指出当事人的自愿性在仲裁过程中的具体体现,阐述了当事人的自愿性的不可替代性;三是通过分析我国仲裁制度公信力的来源来说明我国现阶段仲裁制度的模式是符合当前的政治、经济、社会环境的;四是通过分析随时可引入的临时仲裁制度来印证我国现阶段仲裁制度的民间性。
[Abstract]:Arbitration, as a way to settle civil and commercial disputes, refers to the agreement reached by the parties to a dispute before or after the dispute.System and manner of voluntarily submitting the dispute to a neutral third party for adjudication.In China, arbitration, as a legal system transplanted from the West, has made great achievements.The formal establishment of the current mode of civil and commercial arbitration in China should be bounded by the promulgation of the Arbitration Law of the people's Republic of China on August 31, 1994.At this moment, the civil and commercial arbitration system of our country finally started.Since the date of implementation of the Arbitration Law, the construction of China's national commercial arbitration system has entered a fast track, and the study of arbitration theory has also been on the rise.It has formed the legal foundation for the development of our country's arbitration system and the arbitration institution, and has played a milestone role in the history of our country's arbitration development. It indicates that the construction of China's arbitration system is moving towards the direction of standardization and internationalization.Greatly promoted the arbitration system construction.However, in the field of arbitration theory research, the vast majority of scholars in the theoretical circle have greatly questioned the folklore of China's civil and commercial arbitration system, calling for "deadministrative", that is, the arbitration system should be purely folk.We should give up the current administrative color, and put forward a lot of criticism on the nature of the present arbitration system and the form of the arbitration institution, which is not conducive to the development of the arbitration system in China.This paper begins with the analysis of the civil and commercial arbitration system of our country, first of all, expounds the present situation of civil and commercial arbitration system in our country, and analyzes the dispute root of the civil and commercial arbitration system in our country at the present stage.Secondly, it focuses on the analysis of the causes of the administrative color of the civil and commercial arbitration system at the present stage of our country, mainly analyzes the basis of the civil and commercial arbitration system in our country at present, the influence of the legal environment on the arbitration system and the current management mode of the arbitration institution.Secondly, it mainly analyzes the decisive effect of the parties' voluntary nature on the characteristics of the civil and commercial arbitration system of our country at present, and further clarifies that the voluntary nature of the parties is the most direct element of the civil nature of the arbitration system.It points out the concrete embodiment of the parties' voluntariness in the process of arbitration, and expounds the irreplaceable nature of the parties' voluntary nature.Thirdly, by analyzing the sources of the credibility of the arbitration system in our country, the author explains that the mode of the arbitration system in our country at present is in line with the current political, economic and social environment;Fourth, the analysis of the temporary arbitration system can be introduced at any time to verify the current arbitration system in China.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.7

【相似文献】