二审和解协议与一审生效判决的效力冲突问题研究——最高人民法院2号指导案例的拓展思考

发布时间：2018-04-04 17:32

本文选题：和解协议　切入点：生效判决　出处：《法律适用》2014年12期

【摘要】：二审中达成的和解协议为当事人之间的私法契约,不必然具有程序效力和执行效力,司法实践中原告以申请执行一审生效判决对抗二审和解协议的履行,违背了诚信原则。以"执行力替代说"的观点,认定二审中和解协议的性质为不执行契约,具备约束不为强制执行或一定期间前不为强制执行的效力,参照执行中和解协议的相关法律规定来解决原告违约所致的二审和解协议与一审生效判决的效力冲突问题,以二审中和解协议已经履行完毕为由,不予执行一审生效判决。从而尊重和保障了当事人按照诚实信用原则履行二审诉讼中的和解协议,灵活地贯彻执行了2号案例的法理精神,并进而对二审中和解协议和一审生效判决的关系做出了符合实质正义理念的新解。
[Abstract]:The settlement agreement reached in the second instance is a private law contract between the parties, which does not necessarily have procedural effect and enforcement effect. In judicial practice, the plaintiff applies for the execution of the first instance effective judgment against the performance of the second instance settlement agreement, which violates the principle of good faith.From the point of view of "executive power substitution", it is concluded that the nature of the settlement agreement in the second instance is a non-execution contract and has the effect of binding not to be enforced or not to be enforced before a certain period of time.Referring to the relevant legal provisions of the settlement agreement in execution to resolve the conflict between the second trial settlement agreement caused by the plaintiff's breach of contract and the effective judgment of the first instance, the effective judgment of the first instance shall not be executed on the grounds that the settlement agreement in the second instance has been fulfilled.In order to respect and protect the parties in accordance with the principle of good faith in the implementation of the second instance of the settlement agreement, flexible implementation of the case No. 2 legal spirit,Furthermore, the relationship between the settlement agreement in the second instance and the effective judgment of the first instance is interpreted in accordance with the concept of substantive justice.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学经济法学院;
【分类号】：D920.5;D925.1

【参考文献】