行政证据在刑事诉讼中的转换问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-05 07:08

本文选题：行政证据　切入点：刑事证据　出处：《湘潭大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：在我国长期的司法实践中，大量的行政证据被公安司法机关运用刑事诉讼活动中，这样做既节省了司法资源，降低了刑事案件的办案成本，又提高了刑事司法诉讼效率。但是其被人诟病的是：公安司法机关将行政证据运用到刑事诉讼活动中，其法律依据何在？能否运用？是直接运用还是转换运用？2012年出台的《刑事诉讼法》，解决了这个司法实践困境，第五十二条第二款确立了行政证据向刑事证据转换的证据制度。笔者首先从理论和证据转换必要性两个方面来阐述行政证据向刑事证据转换的依据，重点分析行政证据与刑事证据的共性和差异。其次，着重通过比较《最高人民法院关于适用中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法若干问题的解释》（以下简称“最高法的司法解释”）和《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则（试行）》（以下简称“最高检的司法解释”）对行政证据向刑事证据转换的解释，来阐述自己的观点，导出行政证据转换运用到刑事诉讼中的证据范围。第三，从行政证据向刑事证据转换的审查主体、审查内容及适用的证据规则三个方面阐述行政证据向刑事证据转换的审查机制，论述证据转换过程中应当注意的问题及解决方法。最后，笔者为我国构建完善的行政证据向刑事证据转换制度提出具体设想，希望有助于立法和实践。
[Abstract]:In our country's long-term judicial practice, a large amount of administrative evidence is used by the public security judicial organs in criminal proceedings, which not only saves judicial resources, reduces the cost of handling criminal cases, but also improves the efficiency of criminal judicial proceedings.But what it is criticized is: what is the legal basis for the application of administrative evidence in criminal proceedings by the public security judicial organs?Can you use it?The Criminal procedure Law, issued in 2012, solved the dilemma of judicial practice, and the second paragraph of Article 52 established the evidence system of transforming administrative evidence into criminal evidence.Firstly, the author expounds the basis of transforming administrative evidence into criminal evidence from two aspects of theory and the necessity of evidence conversion, and analyzes the commonness and difference between administrative evidence and criminal evidence.Secondly,The comparison between the interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on some issues concerning the Application of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "the Judicial interpretation of the Supreme Law") and the Criminal procedure rules of the people's Procuratorate (on trial) "The interpretation of the conversion of administrative evidence to criminal evidence, referred to as "the Judicial interpretation of the Supreme Procuratorate",To explain their own views, the transfer of administrative evidence into the scope of evidence in criminal proceedings.Thirdly, it expounds the examination mechanism of the conversion from administrative evidence to criminal evidence from three aspects: the subject of examination, the content of examination and the applicable rules of evidence.This paper discusses the problems and solutions in the process of evidence conversion.Finally, the author puts forward concrete ideas for constructing a perfect system of conversion from administrative evidence to criminal evidence, hoping that it will be helpful to legislation and practice.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】