刑事案件速裁程序的改革定位和实证探析——兼论与“认罪认罚从宽制度”的理性衔接

发布时间：2018-04-05 09:29

本文选题：刑事案件速裁程序　切入点：认罪认罚从宽　出处：《中国刑事法杂志》2016年06期

【摘要】：刑事案件速裁程序两年改革试点期限届满后,认罪认罚从宽制度试点在原试点城市继续实施。刑事案件速裁程序作为认罪认罚从宽制度的先行探索,(1)在试点路径上具有承接关系。就立法取向而言,诉讼效率在正当程序和犯罪控制模式下具有独立的品格,但在规范层面上尚未突破"简易之简易"的藩篱,以审判阶段速裁为主线的改革思路不利于刑事诉讼效率的整体提升,在试点期间出现了内外因动力不足、被告人诉讼权利被约束、值班律师职能缺位、量刑优惠欠规范化等问题。应探索构建全流程刑事速裁制度,使公检法司各机关的办案职能与案件流转符合刑事案件速裁程序的效率要求;研究构建程序选择权、知悉权、法律援助强制介入、量刑优惠规范化、证明标准差异化等,塑造刑事案件速裁程序独有的立法和司法品格,以此作为深化认罪认罚从宽制度改革的有效路径。
[Abstract]:After the expiration of the two-year trial period for the reform of criminal cases' quick adjudication procedure, the leniency system of guilty pleading and penalizing continues to be carried out in the former pilot cities.As the lenient system of guilty plea and punishment, the criminal cases' quick adjudication procedure has a relationship of acceptance in the pilot route.As far as legislative orientation is concerned, litigation efficiency has its own character under due process and crime control mode, but it has not broken through the barrier of "simple and simple" on the normative level.The reform thinking of taking the trial stage as the main line is not conducive to the overall improvement of the efficiency of criminal proceedings. During the pilot period, there appeared insufficient internal and external motive power, the defendant's litigation right was restricted, and the duty lawyer's function was absent.Sentencing preference is not standardized and so on.It is necessary to explore the construction of the criminal adjudication system of the whole process, to make the case handling function and case flow of the Public Prosecution Department conform to the efficiency requirements of the criminal case expediting procedure, to study the construction of procedure option, the right to know, and the compulsory intervention of legal aid.The standardization of sentencing preference, the difference of proof standard, and so on, shape the unique legislative and judicial character of the criminal cases' quick adjudication procedure, as an effective way to deepen the reform of the lenient system of guilty pleading and penalizing.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】