当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

服刑人员权力保护制度研究

发布时间:2018-04-05 20:57

  本文选题:服刑 切入点:人员 出处:《华中师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:中国政府历来重视服刑人员权利的保障。中国《宪法》、《刑法》、《刑诉法》、《监狱法》等法律明确规定了服刑人员的合法权利,比如服刑人员享有生存、人身、财产、宗教信仰、申诉、控告、检举、法定的家属知情、通信与会见亲属、受教育、获得刑事奖励和行政奖励等方面的基本权利。本文主要介绍了服刑人员权利的界定,包括服刑人员权利特点、分类、及权利内容,分析服刑人员权利保护制度的现状和存在的问题。美国、英国、加拿大等国在减少适用监禁性刑罚方面的实践做法,他们通过开发各种风险评估工具、开发新科技电子监控技术等并投入使用,通过在监狱中开展文化课教育、职业技能培训等项目,尽量使危险性较低的违法人员不关押到监禁性设施中,或者使关押在监禁性设施中的囚犯早日释放到社会中生活,取得了良好的效果。还有对于老年犯、怀孕和哺乳期妇女尽量不予关押,可以相应轻减轻监狱人口爆满状况,削减监禁性刑罚的开支。监禁是使坏人更坏、花费高昂的方法,强化服刑人员与家庭和社区的关系是减少重新违法犯罪、避免监狱服刑再遗症的最好办法。尽管各国国情、矫正传统、矫正文化不同,但对服刑人员的管理上,其核心是要保障监狱的安全和尊重服刑人员的人权。本文通过比较分析,并积极吸收借鉴国外在保障人权工作方面的做法和经验,促进我国服刑人员权利保护制度不断的完善。中国与德国、法国、英国、美国等国虽然在社会制度、经济发展水平、文化程度等方面存在较大的差距,但在矫治服刑人员、帮助服刑人员回归社会、减少和预防犯罪、保护公民等方面有许多共同或相似之处。我国监狱在执法理念、思想改造、文化教育、劳动改造等方面是先进的,效果是显著的,要毫不动摇的坚持,同时也要积极研究并借鉴世界各国在服刑人员权利保护制度方面有成功做法,不断推进我国的监狱工作。本文完善我国服刑人员权利保护制度的构想包括:健全和完善服刑人员权利保护的法律体系,制度保障教育改造效果的相关规范性文件,充分利用社会资源,完善服刑人员社会化机制。
[Abstract]:The Chinese Government has always attached importance to the protection of the rights of prisoners.The Chinese Constitution, the Criminal Law, the Criminal procedure Law, the Prison Law, and other laws clearly stipulate the lawful rights of the prisoners, such as their right to survive, their person, their property, their religious beliefs, their complaints, their complaints, their whistleblower, and their legal family members' knowledge.Basic rights in communication and meeting with relatives, education, criminal and administrative rewards.This paper mainly introduces the definition of the rights of the prisoners, including the characteristics, classification and content of the rights of the prisoners, and analyzes the current situation and existing problems of the system of protecting the rights of the prisoners.In the United States, Britain, Canada and other countries, the practice of reducing the application of custodial penalties has been achieved. They have developed and put into use various risk assessment tools, new scientific and technological electronic surveillance techniques, and cultural education in prisons.Such programs as vocational skills training, so that the less dangerous offenders are not detained in prison facilities, or prisoners in prison facilities released into the community as soon as possible, and achieved good results.For older offenders, pregnant and lactating women are kept as little as possible, reducing prison overcrowding and spending less on prison sentences.Imprisonment is a costly way to make bad people worse. Strengthening relationships between inmates and their families and communities is the best way to reduce recidivism and avoid relegation to prison terms.Although different countries have different national conditions, correctional traditions and different cultures, the core of the management of prisoners is to ensure the security of prisons and to respect the human rights of prisoners.Through comparison and analysis, this paper actively absorbs the practices and experiences of foreign countries in the protection of human rights, and promotes the continuous improvement of the system of protecting the rights of prisoners in our country.Although China and Germany, France, the United Kingdom, the United States, and other countries have large gaps in social systems, economic development levels, and educational levels, they have been correcting prisoners, helping them to return to society, and reducing and preventing crimes.There are many similarities or similarities in the protection of citizens.China's prisons are advanced in the areas of law enforcement, ideological reform, cultural education, labor reform, and so on, and the results are remarkable. We must unswervingly adhere to them.At the same time, we should actively study and draw lessons from the successful practices in the system of protecting the rights of prisoners in the world, and continue to promote the prison work in our country.The idea of perfecting the system of protecting the rights of prisoners in our country includes: perfecting and perfecting the legal system of protecting the rights of prisoners, the relevant normative documents of the system to guarantee the effect of educational reform, and making full use of social resources.Improve the socialization mechanism of prisoners.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926.7

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 叶旺春;;英国监狱社会监督制度的考察及对我国的借鉴价值[J];刑法论丛;2011年01期

2 邓伟志;;“转型管理”的根本出发点——参观德国男牢纪实[J];学术界;2010年11期

3 陈荣刚;;浅析罪犯的权利及罪犯权利保障的误区[J];科技信息;2010年23期

4 韦三保;储鑫;;对罪犯权利的几点思考——以华东地区A监狱为例[J];法制与社会;2010年04期

5 刘毅;;公权力下的罪犯私权保障探析[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2009年04期

6 Patrick Landmann;游益萍;;法国监狱[J];南方人物周刊;2009年22期

7 朱永超;;对我国刑罚执行人道主义缺失的思考——以自由刑的执行为视角[J];法制与社会;2009年09期

8 刘金霞;;浅析我国罪犯权利保护存在的问题及改进措施[J];法制与社会;2009年03期

9 吴宗宪;;论美国犯人的法律权利[J];中国刑事法杂志;2007年06期

10 吕新雪;;法治视野中的罪犯权利保障[J];法制与社会;2007年09期



本文编号:1716427

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1716427.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户65ddb***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com