我国大陪审制研究

发布时间：2018-04-05 21:07

  本文选题：大陪审制　切入点：选任条件　出处：《湖南大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国对陪审制度开始了新一轮的试点改革,提出了大陪审制。大陪审制与以往不同,降低了学历要求,提高了年龄要求,增加了合议庭中陪审员人数,增强了陪审员选任程序的随机性,改变了以往陪审员与法官同等权利的规则,让陪审员审判事实问题,不再参与法律适用问题的表决。我国实施大陪审制是有必要的,因为大合议庭可以提高陪审意见的相对代表性进一步彰显司法民主,有利于司法监督和提高司法公信力,解决现实中陪而不审等问题,实现公民和法官的互补,也能妥善应对立案登记制带来的大量案件和社会转型期的一些复杂案件。在试点改革后,我国实施大陪审制是可行的。民事诉讼法等规定没有限制陪审员人数,群众积极参与司法提供了舆论支持,倍增计划提供了人力支持。实践中已经有试点法院进行了尝试并且韩日陪审制改革的经验显示大合议庭是可行的。《试点方案》和《实施办法》的改进规定对陪审制度的运行起到了良好的推动作用,但仍然存在不足：陪审制度的法律地位较低,大陪审制适用范围规定模糊,大陪审制的选任条件和程序可操作性不强,参审机制不健全,陪审员的履职保障有待加强。针对以上问题,可以从下面几个角度完善大陪审制：提高陪审制度的法律地位,明确大陪审制的适用范围,完善大陪审制的选任条件、程序和参审机制,强化陪审员的履职保障。其中较为重要的是完善大陪审制的选任条件、程序和参审机制。可以坚信通过两年法院的实践积累,大陪审制定会不断完善。
[Abstract]:China began a new round of trial reform of jury system and put forward a large jury system.The large jury system is different from the past. It reduces the educational requirements, raises the age requirement, increases the number of jurors in the collegiate bench, enhances the randomness of the jury selection process, and changes the rules of equal rights between jurors and judges in the past.Let jurors try factual issues and no longer vote on the application of the law.To realize the complementarity between citizens and judges, it can also deal with a large number of cases brought about by the registration system and some complicated cases in the period of social transformation.After the pilot reform, the implementation of the jury system is feasible.Civil procedure law does not limit the number of jurors, the masses actively participate in the administration of justice to provide public opinion support, multiplication plan to provide human support.In practice, some pilot courts have tried and the experience of the Korean and Japanese jury system reform has shown that the grand collegial bench is feasible. The improvement of the "pilot program" and "measures of implementation" has played a good role in promoting the operation of the jury system.However, there are still shortcomings: the legal status of the jury system is low, the scope of application of the large jury system is vague, the selection conditions and procedures of the large jury system are not strong, the mechanism of trial participation is not perfect, and the guarantee for the discharge of duties of jurors needs to be strengthened.In view of the above problems, we can improve the large jury system from the following angles: to improve the legal status of the jury system, to clarify the scope of application of the large jury system, to perfect the selection conditions, procedures and mechanisms of the large jury system,Strengthen the protection of jurors to perform their duties.One of the more important is to perfect the selection conditions, procedures and mechanisms of the jury system.We can firmly believe that through two years of court practice accumulation, the jury formulation will continue to improve.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D926;D925.1
，

本文编号：1716453