当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

我国民事诉讼调解反悔制度的完善

发布时间:2018-04-06 23:16

  本文选题:民事诉讼调解 切入点:反悔权 出处:《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:在我国的司法实践中,法院调解是我国人民法院审理民事案件的一种重要方式,也是符合我国国情的当代司法制度经验的精华之一。我国的司法制度是现代经验的结晶,为我国的社会主义建设和维护社会稳定起到了积极的作用。但随着市场经济体制的建立和民主建设的发展,现行调解制度的一些问题已经日益明显,在公平和效率方面给我国的社会主义法治建设带来了困扰,从民事诉讼的调解制度来看,其中的反悔制度是存在一定的问题的,在司法实践中也确实存在当事人滥用反悔权的情形。文章第一部分民事诉讼调解反悔制度的相关学说谈起,对两种学说分别进行了阐述。第二部分对我国反悔制度的相关法律规定进行了介绍,通过相关的案例对当事人反悔的原因进行分析,进而指出现行反悔制度存在的缺陷及造成的危害。第三部分从四个方面对反悔制度在我国存在的必要性进行了论述。第四部分通过介绍美国、德国、日本、英国及我国台湾地区的相关制度规定,指出对我国现行反悔制度可以借鉴的部分。第五部分提出完善我国民事诉讼调解反悔制度的立法建议,以期有助于我国法治建设的进步。
[Abstract]:In the judicial practice of our country, court mediation is an important way for the people's court to try civil cases, and it is also one of the quintessence of the contemporary judicial system experience in accordance with the national conditions of our country.The judicial system of our country is the crystallization of modern experience, which plays an active role in the socialist construction and the maintenance of social stability.However, with the establishment of market economy system and the development of democratic construction, some problems of the current mediation system have become increasingly obvious, which has troubled the construction of socialist rule of law in China in terms of fairness and efficiency.From the point of view of the mediation system of civil action, there are certain problems in the system of abrogation, and the situation of abusing the right of estoppel does exist in the judicial practice.The first part of the article discusses the relevant theories of the mediation system of civil action and expounds the two theories respectively.The second part introduces the relevant laws and regulations of our country's reneging system, analyzes the reasons of the parties' retrogression through the relevant cases, and then points out the defects and the harm caused by the current system of retrogression.The third part discusses the necessity of estoppel system in our country from four aspects.The fourth part introduces the relevant regulations of the United States, Germany, Japan, Britain and Taiwan, and points out the parts that can be used for reference to the current contrite system of our country.In the fifth part, the author puts forward some legislative suggestions to perfect the system of mediation of civil action in China, in order to help the progress of the construction of the rule of law in our country.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 谢怀h;;;谢怀h;教授序[J];私法;2013年01期

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 周优菊;民事诉讼中电子截屏证据的审查判断研究[D];广西大学;2017年

2 宋娟;民事诉讼送达难及其对策研究[D];郑州大学;2017年



本文编号:1719355

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1719355.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户1b9d0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com