当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

我国审判信息公开研究

发布时间:2018-04-08 09:42

  本文选题:审判信息公开 切入点:司法公正 出处:《海南大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:全面推进司法信息公开是我国建设社会主义法治国家的必然要求,是实现司法独立与公正、提升司法公信力、促进审判监督以及保障公民知情权的重要举措。审判信息公开是司法信息公开的重要内容,贯穿于诉讼活动的全过程,实现审判信息公开当然的也具有更好的保证司法独立与公正,更好的保障公民权利等作用。自从司法改革被提出以来,审判信息公开也在我国各级人民法院中逐步推进,并且取得了一定的成绩,如审判信息公开的范围有所扩大、审判信息公开的途径越加多样化等,司法透明度得到了明显的提高。但由于一些原因,以至于一些规定未能真正得到落实,审判信息公开实施的不够彻底。审判信息公开作为司法信息公开的重要内容,具有重要的地位,研究审判信息公开在实践中存在的具体问题,进而提出相关的完善建议,有利于尽快的建设出一套符合国家利益和人民利益,符合司法发展方向的审判信息公开制度,对全面建设社会主义法治社会有着必然的社会意义。本文将通过以下三个模块来对我国审判信息公开问题进行阐述:第一部分主要介绍审判信息公开的概念以及价值。这部分一是解决何为审判信息的问题,对审判信息的范围进行界定,为下文奠定理论基础;二是阐述审判信息公开的价值,审判信息公开不仅有助于推动司法独立与公正以及提高司法公信力,其还是保障公民知情权的一个重要方式,另外,审判信息公开就是把法院的审判活动完全公之于众,使社会公众能够切实了解司法工作人员的工作,实现公民对司法工作人员司法活动的监督。正因为审判信息公开具有其独特的价值,他才值得我们费力研究并发现问题、提出解决方案。第二部分主要是对我国法院审判信息公开的现状及其存在的问题进行分析。这部分内容首先要求对我国审判信息公开的现状有相对准确的分析,只有对现状分析准确了,找出的问题才会是目前切实存在的问题,提出的建议也才具有实际价值。目前我国各个地区、各个级别的法院审判信息的公开程度和方式都有所不同,笔者通过翻阅相关文献,浏览各级人民法院官方网站以及各信息公开专门网站,调查了解我国法院审判信息的公开现状,进而总结出目前我国审判信息公开存在的问题,主要包括缺少法律支撑、缺乏监督和救济机制、信息公开不全面不及时等普适性问题。第三部分主要是针对我国法院审判信息公开存在的问题提出相关的完善建议。针对我国当前审判信息公开中存在的问题,笔者提出从完善立法、建立监督和救济机制、培养审判机关对公开的正确认识、明确审判信息公开范围以及构建审判信息公开的途径五个方面对我国审判信息公开进行完善。
[Abstract]:It is necessary for our country to build a socialist country ruled by law to promote the publicity of judicial information in an all-round way. It is also an important measure to realize judicial independence and impartiality, to enhance judicial credibility, to promote judicial supervision and to protect citizens' right to know.Open trial information is an important content of judicial information disclosure, which runs through the whole process of litigation. Of course, the realization of open trial information also has a better guarantee of judicial independence and impartiality, better protection of civil rights and so on.Since the judicial reform was put forward, the publicity of trial information has been gradually promoted in the people's courts at all levels in our country, and has made certain achievements. For example, the scope of open trial information has been expanded, the channels of opening trial information have become more and more diversified, and so on.Judicial transparency has been significantly improved.However, for some reasons, some regulations have not been really implemented, and the public implementation of trial information is not thorough enough.As an important content of judicial information publicity, the open trial information has an important position. This paper studies the concrete problems existing in the practice of the trial information publicity, and then puts forward the relevant perfect suggestions.It is beneficial to the construction of an open system of trial information, which conforms to the interests of the country and the people and the direction of judicial development, which is of inevitable social significance to the construction of a socialist society ruled by law in an all-round way.In this paper, the following three modules will be used to explain the issue of open trial information in China: the first part mainly introduces the concept and value of trial information disclosure.The first part is to solve the problem of what is the trial information, to define the scope of the trial information, to lay the theoretical foundation for the following; the second is to elaborate the value of the trial information publicity.Open trial information is not only helpful to promote judicial independence and impartiality and enhance judicial credibility, but also an important way to protect citizens' right to know. In addition, open trial information is to make the trial activities of the court completely public.So that the public can understand the work of judicial staff and realize the supervision of judicial activities.It is because of the unique value of open trial information that it is worth our effort to study and discover problems and put forward solutions.The second part mainly analyzes the current situation and existing problems of court trial information disclosure in our country.First of all, this part requires a relatively accurate analysis of the current situation of the disclosure of trial information in China. Only when the analysis of the present situation is accurate, can the problem be identified as a practical problem and the suggestions put forward have practical value.At present, there are differences in the degree and manner of disclosure of court information in various regions and levels of our country. By reading the relevant documents, I browse the official websites of people's courts at all levels and the special websites for information disclosure.This paper investigates the current situation of the disclosure of judicial information in Chinese courts, and sums up the problems existing in the publicity of judicial information in our country, including the lack of legal support, the lack of supervision and relief mechanism, the lack of comprehensive and timely disclosure of information, and so on.The third part is to put forward some suggestions on the problems of open trial information in our country.In view of the problems existing in the publicity of trial information in our country, the author puts forward the following suggestions: perfecting legislation, establishing supervision and relief mechanism, and training the judicial organs' correct understanding of the publicity.This paper clarifies the scope of open trial information and the ways to construct open trial information.
【学位授予单位】:海南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926.2

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李峰;入世后我国法院执行工作面临的新问题及对策[J];山东审判;2001年02期

2 张卫平;论我国法院体制的非行政化——法院体制改革的一种基本思路[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2000年03期

3 贺小勇;论世贸组织协定在我国法院的适用问题[J];国际贸易问题;2001年03期

4 朱庚;;我国法院信息化建设探讨[J];科技成果纵横;2006年04期

5 王莉;;论我国法院体制改革的目标选择[J];中共郑州市委党校学报;2006年05期

6 李旺;谢晴川;;我国法院对日劳工索赔诉讼的管辖权问题研究[J];清华法学;2009年06期

7 宋建立;;不便管辖原则在我国法院的适用[J];人民司法;2012年21期

8 辛琪;如何使我国法院的判决在外国执行[J];中国商贸;1996年20期

9 谭世贵;;我国法院司法信息公开的实践、问题与对策[J];法治研究;2014年04期

10 黄鸣鹤;;当前我国法院人事制度和机构改革走势微探[J];福建法学;2000年01期

相关会议论文 前4条

1 田孟华;;创建学习型法院与提高法院审判质效——基于我国法院党建工作的思考[A];当代法学论坛(二0一一年第三辑)[C];2011年

2 田孟华;;创建学习型法院与提高法院审判质效——基于我国法院党建工作的思考[A];当代法学论坛(2011年第2辑)[C];2011年

3 黄韬;;考察我国法院处理不良金融债权争议案件的政治维度[A];2009年度(第七届)中国法经济学论坛论文集[C];2009年

4 宫澎;;对法院改革背景下法官教育培训的几点思考[A];法学教育:比较与省思——现代法学教育论坛文集[C];2001年

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 何秋婷;论世贸协议在我国法院的适用[N];人民法院报;2000年

2 本报记者 胡Z凇⊥ㄑ对,

本文编号:1721061


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1721061.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户996d4***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com