死因调查制度的问题与重构——以普通法系的死因裁判制度为借鉴

发布时间：2018-04-09 01:23

本文选题：死因调查制度　切入点：死因裁判制度　出处：《比较法研究》2016年03期

【摘要】：当今世界的死因调查制度大致可以分为独立式模式与附属式模式两大类。我国的死因调查制度完全附属于刑事诉讼,并不存在一套独立、完整的死因调查制度体系,且由侦查机关完全主导,导致了程序逻辑上的悖论和结构上的失衡,在部分案件的实践中造成了司法公信力的弱化。普通法系的死因裁判制度具有独立性强、程序公正、社会参与度高、司法公信力强的优点。我国可借鉴普通法系的死因裁判制度且结合自身司法体制的特点,确立独立式的死因调查模式,建立死因调查委员会,完善调查程序,使调查结论更具社会公信力。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, the system of death investigation in the world can be divided into two categories: the independent mode and the subsidiary mode.The death investigation system of our country is completely subordinate to the criminal procedure, and there is no independent, complete system of the death investigation system, and it is completely dominated by the investigation organ, which leads to the paradox of procedure logic and the imbalance of structure.The judicial credibility has been weakened in the practice of some cases.The common law system has the advantages of strong independence, fair procedure, high social participation and strong judicial credibility.In our country, we can learn from the common law system and combine the characteristics of our own judicial system, establish the independent mode of death investigation, establish the death investigation committee, perfect the procedure of investigation, and make the conclusion of investigation more credible.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学法政学院法律系;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】