英法德荷意技术侦查的程序性控制

发布时间：2018-04-10 04:35

本文选题：技术侦查　切入点：程序性控制　出处：《环球法律评论》2013年04期

【摘要】：以英法德荷意五国为代表,欧洲的技术侦查经历了逐步演进的过程,从而形成了具有共性并各有特色的程序性控制机制。欧洲人权法院的判决对上述国家的技术侦查制度产生了重要影响。五国对于技术侦查的决定程序远未达成共识,司法审查、准司法审查和行政审查三种模式是各国在本国刑事司法的特点的基础上所作出的选择。技术侦查的适用范围经历了从立法限制到有限度扩张的变化,从传统的秘密监控领域扩展到新兴领域,并为应对有组织犯罪、恐怖主义等极端犯罪而表现出扩张的趋势。比例原则和必要性原则成为基本准则,体现出欧洲公法的特点。通过执行的具体程序来规制技术侦查的适用,从操作性和细节上防止技术侦查的滥用。相关比较可以为我国的技术侦查法治化提供借鉴。
[Abstract]:With Britain, France, Germany, Netherlands and Italy as the representative, the technical investigation in Europe has undergone a gradual evolution process, thus forming a common and characteristic procedural control mechanism.The decision of the European Court of Human Rights has had an important impact on the system of technical investigations in these countries.The five countries have not reached a consensus on the decision procedure of technical investigation. Judicial review, quasi-judicial review and administrative review are the choices made by each country on the basis of the characteristics of its own criminal justice.The scope of application of technical investigation has experienced the change from the legislative limitation to the limited expansion, from the traditional secret surveillance field to the emerging field, and to deal with organized crime, terrorism and other extreme crimes and shows an expansion trend.The principle of proportionality and necessity has become the basic principle, reflecting the characteristics of European public law.The application of technical investigation is regulated by the specific procedure of execution, and the abuse of technical investigation is prevented from the aspects of operation and detail.The relevant comparison can provide reference for the legalization of technical investigation in our country.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目(11AZD020) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金浙江省钱江人才计划资助
【分类号】：D915.3

【参考文献】