刑事裁判文书繁简分流问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-10 21:51

本文选题：裁判文书 + 繁简分流　；参考：《法学家》2017年05期

【摘要】：实现裁判文书繁简分流是最高人民法院《四五改革纲要》提出的一项改革任务。刑事裁判文书繁简分流的根本原因,是目前我国刑事裁判文书同质化现象比较严重,与刑事诉讼法规定的多元化审判程序不匹配,需要说理的没有充分深入说理,不需要深入说理的也得"八股文式"地列举"裁判理由",导致"繁者不繁、简者不简",不利于司法资源的优化配置。"控辩双方在审判中的对抗程度"是审判程序、裁判文书繁简分流的决定因素,审判程序类型是决定刑事裁判文书繁简分流的直接标准。要式裁判文书适用于"对抗式审判程序",应当格式规范,要素齐全,而且必须进行充分深入的释法说理。"简式裁判文书"适用于"合意式审判程序",其释法说理以简单的形式进行,一般不需要长篇大论式地阐述裁判理由,只要把有关事项,特别是对"认罪认罚""控辩协议"等事情进行真实的记载,就是在为裁判主文阐述理由。
[Abstract]:It is a reform task put forward by the Supreme people's Court in the fourth five-year Reform outline to realize the diversion of judgment documents.The fundamental reason for the diversion of criminal adjudicative documents is that the homogeneity of criminal adjudicative documents in our country is quite serious at present, which does not match with the pluralistic trial procedures stipulated in the Criminal procedure Law, and what needs to be reasoned is not fully and deeply reasoned.Those who do not need to go deep into reasoning have to enumerate the "judgment reasons" in the form of "eight strands", which leads to "the complicated person is not complicated, the simple person is not simple", which is not conducive to the optimal allocation of judicial resources. "The degree of confrontation between the prosecution and the defense in the trial "is the decisive factor of the trial procedure, and the type of the trial procedure is the direct standard to decide the diversion of the criminal judgment document."An important adjudicatory document is applicable to the adversarial trial procedure. It should be standardized in format, complete in elements, and must be fully and deeply interpreted. "The simplified judgment document "applies to the" consensual trial procedure ", and its interpretation is conducted in a simple form. Generally, it is not necessary to elaborate the reasons for the judgment in a lengthy manner, as long as the matter concerned is put forward."In particular, a true record of "confession and punishment", "plea agreement" and so on is to explain the reasons for the referee's subject.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院大学;
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】