论我国诉讼体制转型中释明权制度的构建
发布时间:2018-04-11 04:08
本文选题:释明权 + 职权主义 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:释明权制度作为大陆法系民事诉讼制度的重要组成部分,根植于当事人主义诉讼模式中,与当事人主义的诉讼模式基础——辩论主义有着密切的关系。通过对释明权的概念、特征及性质的阐述,了解释明权产生的体制基础。在计划经济体制下,决定了我国一直采用职权主义的民事诉讼模式,法官享有绝对的诉讼指挥权,因此,理论界和实务界都认为我国并不需要释明权制度。随着市场经济的发展,民事审判方式改革的不断深入,职权主义内容不断被削弱,当事人主义诉讼模式逐步被确立,转型过程中释明权制度的构建,对于满足现实需要,反映正确的司法理念,实现公正效率价值具有重要意义。但面对我国释明权存在的认识偏差、立法模糊、实践混乱的状况,我们应从释明权行使的原则、范围的确立、方式的规范及不当释明的救济等方面全面构建符合我国国情的释明权制度。
[Abstract]:As an important part of civil litigation system in continental law system, the system of interpretation right of interpretation is rooted in the mode of litigant litigation and has a close relationship with argumentalism, the foundation of litigant litigation mode.Through the explanation of the concept, characteristics and nature of the right of interpretation, this paper explains the institutional basis of the emergence of the right of interpretation.Under the planned economy system, it is decided that our country has always adopted the mode of civil action based on the doctrine of authority, and the judge has the absolute command of litigation. Therefore, the theorists and the practitioners think that the system of interpretation power is not needed in our country.With the development of the market economy, the deepening of the reform of the civil trial mode, the weakening of the contents of the doctrine of authority, the gradual establishment of the mode of litigant litigation, the construction of the system of clarifying the right of interpretation in the course of the transformation, it is necessary to meet the practical needs.It is of great significance to reflect the correct judicial idea and realize the value of justice and efficiency.However, in the face of the cognitive deviation, vague legislation and chaotic practice of the right of interpretation in China, we should establish the principle and scope of the exercise of the right of interpretation.The standard of the mode and the relief of improper interpretation are all-around to construct the system of interpretation right in accordance with the national conditions of our country.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 蔡虹;释明权:基础透视与制度构建[J];法学评论;2005年01期
2 唐磊;朱传生;;释明权:幽灵还是精灵[J];社会科学研究;2006年05期
,本文编号:1734347
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1734347.html