以审判为中心若干基本问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-11 06:14

本文选题：以审判为中心 + 庭审实质化　；参考：《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着十八届四中全会的召开,我国的“以审判为中心”诉讼制度改革越来越受到国家和人民的重视。尤其是立法机关和司法机关积极响应,纷纷公布了自己的关于“以审判为中心”诉讼制度改革的文件和配套制度。我国立法机关和司法机关的关注,也使得这一改革极大的激发了法律工作者、法律研究者以及公民的参与热情,更好的促进改革措施的实施与推进。本文正是在这样的背景下进行研究和创作,通过广泛阅读收集材料信息,翻阅法律典籍,最终得出一些浅薄的个人见解和想法。论文主要通过分析我国侦查机关,检察机关,审判机关这三大机关对这一改革的具体应对措施,德美日三国相类似改革措施的经验教训,来更好的分析和理解当前我国所进行的一系列围绕“以审判为中心”的诉讼制度改革的举措。通过对我国当前推进此项改革现状以及所面临的问题的分析,诸如“侦查中心主义”盛行,证据裁判原则贯彻不彻底的问题等。结合国内外法律大家的见解和著述,分法院、公检、当事人三个主体角度进行了建议,这也是本文相对其他文章比较新颖之处。
[Abstract]:With the holding of the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, our country and people pay more and more attention to the reform of "trial as the center" litigation system.In particular, the legislature and the judiciary responded positively by publishing their own documents and supporting systems for the reform of the litigation system of "taking trial as the center" one after another.The attention of the legislative and judicial organs of our country also makes this reform greatly stimulate the participation enthusiasm of legal workers, legal researchers and citizens, and better promote the implementation and promotion of reform measures.This article is in this background to research and creation, through extensive reading and collecting materials and information, reading the law books, and finally some shallow personal opinions and ideas.This paper mainly analyzes the experiences and lessons of the three major organs of our country, namely, the investigative organs, the procuratorial organs and the judicial organs, in response to this reform, and the similar reform measures in Germany, the United States and Japan.In order to better analyze and understand the current series of measures carried out around the "trial as the center" of litigation system reform.Based on the analysis of the current situation and problems faced with in promoting this reform in China, such as the prevalence of "investigative centralism" and the incomplete implementation of the principle of evidence adjudication, etc.Combined with the opinions and writings of domestic and foreign legal people, the author makes suggestions from three main points of view: the court, the public procurator and the litigant. This is also the novelty of this paper compared with other articles.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】