论我国行政机关行政诉讼应诉制度的现状及完善

发布时间：2018-04-12 13:08

本文选题：行政诉讼 + 应诉　；参考：《暨南大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：在立法不完善,司法机关不独立,行政权扩大和传统行政观念的综合影响下,我国行政诉讼应诉制度还不够健全。行政机关在行政诉讼应诉时,如何在外部和内部都形成良好约束机制,从而实现行政诉讼本身的价值,是本文立意所在。笔者通过对我国行政机关行政诉讼应诉制度的历史沿革和立法、理论研究的总结归纳,发现国内在如何通过内外结合,对行政机关行政诉讼应诉工作加强规范和监督制约领域的研究较为欠缺。行政机关的行政诉讼应诉,既包括行政机关参与诉讼的各个诉讼环节,也包括行政机关行政诉讼应诉外部制度和内部制度两个部分。本文基于对我国行政诉讼应诉制度历史发展过程的考察和对相关数据、案例、规章制度的分析,揭示了我国行政诉讼案件数量较少且地区差异较大、案件多集中在县市两级的政府部门、撤诉裁定和维持判决占相当大比例等现状。笔者在结合自身工作实践的基础上通过实地调研和数据收集,总结出行政机关行政诉讼应诉制度存在下列问题:行政权干预司法权、立法规定过于简陋和倾向保护行政机关、行政机关消极应诉、行政机关应诉工作缺乏完整的工作规范和有效制约等。论文通过抽丝剥茧,将造成我国行政机关行政诉讼应诉存在诸多问题的本质原因进行提炼,并针对性的提出相应的完善建议:一是从立法和司法层面完善行政机关行政诉讼应诉的外部制度;二是行政机关内部要建立制约机制,制定规范文本、推进应诉人才专业化建设、加大对损害行政诉讼公正性行为的惩处力度、建立上下级监督和内部监督双重制约工作规范等。
[Abstract]:Under the influence of imperfect legislation, the independence of the judiciary, the expansion of administrative power and the traditional administrative concept, the system of administrative litigation response in our country is not perfect enough.How to form a good restraint mechanism outside and inside to realize the value of administrative litigation is the purpose of this paper.By summarizing and summarizing the history, legislation and theoretical research of the administrative litigation response system of our country's administrative organs, the author finds out how to combine the inside and outside of our country.The research on administrative litigation response in administrative organs is deficient in the field of standardization and supervision and restriction.The administrative litigation response of the administrative organs includes not only the administrative organs participating in the proceedings, but also the external system and the internal system of the administrative litigation of the administrative organs.Based on the investigation of the historical development of China's administrative litigation response system and the analysis of relevant data, cases and rules and regulations, this paper reveals that the number of administrative litigation cases in China is relatively small and the regional differences are great.The cases are mostly concentrated in the county and city government departments.On the basis of investigation and data collection, the author summarizes the following problems in the administrative litigation response system: the administrative power interferes with the judicial power, the legislative provisions are too simple and tend to protect the administrative organs, and the following problems exist: the administrative power interferes with the judicial power, the legislative provisions are too rudimentary and tend to protect the administrative organs.The negative response of administrative organs, the lack of complete administrative work norms and effective constraints.The paper refines the essential reasons that cause many problems in administrative litigation of administrative organs in our country.And puts forward the corresponding consummation suggestion: first, consummates the external system of administrative litigation response from the legislative and judicial level; second, the administrative organ must establish the restriction mechanism, formulates the standard text,We should promote the professionalization of litigant personnel, increase the punishment for the act of harming the fairness of administrative litigation, and establish the double restriction of supervision by superior and subordinate as well as internal supervision, and so on.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】