转型社会的司法功能建构——从卡理斯玛权威到法理型权威

发布时间：2018-04-13 20:01

本文选题：党管司法 + 政法体制　；参考：《华东政法大学学报》2017年06期

【摘要】：自"革命"以降的民主政治实践,既要绝对保证"党的领导"不动摇,又要以群众自愿跟从的"民主"方式来保有"领导权",最为可行的策略就是诉诸卡理斯玛式的政治权威。然而,当卡理斯玛权威经历复杂的"祛魅"之后,那种意识形态化的信仰机制愈发难以为继。对此,执政党的理性选择是调用国家政治机器的法理型资源,以具有"普适性"的法律来建构社会信任。但是,政治支配的合法性基础必须在"政治性、程序性、职责性"的权力交往结构中合理预设来自法律的"忠诚反对",将政治权力交往内化为法律沟通的理性结构。在这一转化过程中,司法也面临着权威机制转型与信任机制重构的艰巨挑战。
[Abstract]:Since the practice of "revolution" in democratic politics, we should not only absolutely guarantee the "leadership of the Party", but also retain "leadership" in the way of "democracy" which the masses follow voluntarily. The most feasible strategy is to appeal to the political authority of the Karisma style.However, when Carlisma's authority experienced complicated disenchantment, the ideological belief mechanism became more and more difficult to continue.Therefore, the rational choice of the ruling party is to use the legal resources of the national political machine to construct social trust with the "universal" law.However, the legitimacy of political domination must be based on the "political, procedural, and duty" power communication structure, which reasonably presupposes "loyal opposition" from the law, and internalizes the political power communication as a rational structure of legal communication.In the process of this transformation, judicature also faces the formidable challenge of the transformation of authority mechanism and the reconstruction of trust mechanism.
【作者单位】：上海师范大学哲学与法政学院;
【基金】：上海师范大学法律史重点学科以及“城市治理现代化与法制化研究基地”项目的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】